A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_ _The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours | of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) Italy, FDCA, Cantiere #28: ELEMENTS OF CONTINUITY OF EDUCATIONAL ACTION FROM CHILDHOOD TO ADULTHOOD - Paola Perullo (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Thu, 3 Oct 2024 09:21:39 +0300


In the book "Educational Emergency", "School in a globalized society", Franco Frabboni, who recently passed away, raised the issue of globalization, not only on the market side, but on the consequences of a similar phenomenon of globalization of knowledge, through the propaganda of cultural consumption models throughout the world. The result of this is the formation of a single thought, which annihilates plurality and critical thinking. For Frabboni, school should have antidotes, to counteract "the virus" of a mass humanity, capable of activating a single thought, a single mind, and pedagogy, teaching and school, could become the three medicines available to the entire world, to annihilate the negative effects of single thought, making critical and plural thinking prevail. Frabboni had contributed to the historical-social and pedagogical-didactic identity of childhood and its school, developing texts that are still central to the Faculty of Educational Sciences. The focus is on the boy and the girl, on their characteristics and on their way of being in the different moments of growth: on the one hand, the different periods or phases are understood as psychological concepts within which the subject is recognized as having a range of needs and specific ways of fulfilling themselves; on the other hand, when referring to personality as an overall structure, which allows the individual to carry out new evolutionary tasks from time to time, rather than a concept of maturity understood as a succession of changes towards a higher limit state, it is more convenient to adopt a definition of maturity that can be applied to any moment of life. "The mature person is the one who, however he defines the adult and infantile conditions,

A) knows he is an adult and is no longer a child. B) knows and accepts he is also a child.

C) communicates with the child who is confident of not becoming and/or remaining a child again.

If we replace "adult" with "older child" and "child" with "younger child", this definition of maturity is applicable to everyone. And in accordance with the aforementioned definition of maturity, personal development can then be conceived as a series of different maturity levels, achieved by overcoming the successive different crises of existence, throughout life.

What common denominators of educational action guarantee the preservation and enhancement of the ability to think, imagine, intuit, invent? I think there are elements that concern the relationship between teachers and students, which are valid at all ages. And this is understandable. What is more difficult to understand is that one should, in whatever school level one finds oneself operating, in addition to having a serious knowledge of developmental psychology, consider school as an opportunity separate from "usefulness". In other words, I think there is a great misunderstanding about the connection between school and the "real" world, which was passed off as an innovation and ended up instead being a connection with the job market, with rules dictated by neoliberalism, which have also entered the school. So we need to work to recover a mentality that separates itself from the useful and creates the conditions to live the time of school, at all ages, with the conviction that the useless (currently even humanistic studies risk being considered useless...) is the most important thing. The kids must discover, through knowledge and relationships with teachers, what they are truly capable of, what they are passionate about, making them aware of their thinking, independently of the job they will do. If we take this view, what defines significant learning for a child from three to six years old, can be extended up to university. In the 1991 Guidelines for Kindergarten, it is defined that school learning must be constructive-strategic-interactive. Referring to the cognitive theories of Piaget, Vygotskij, Bruner, Olson and Gardner, it is defined:

1) that learning has primarily a constructive character, because learning something does not mean recording or receiving information, but connecting it to information already existing in long-term memory.

2) School learning is not only active, but also has a strategic character: a strategy is essentially a method for tackling a task or more generally for achieving an objective. A strategy controls the cognitive processes or functions involved in the coding, transformation and storage of information.

3) Thirdly, school learning has an interactive character: the child or young person interacts in a learning situation with an educational context, that is, with an organizational structure that includes numerous variables, spaces, times, methods, materials, tools, attitudes, styles and expectations of teachers. If we combine all this with the affective-emotional dimension, as a primary human need but also as a result of a satisfactory relationship with the teacher, I think we can easily find common threads that unite the work of teachers of all levels. Finding these links also means, in my opinion, opposing the current neoliberal plan that wants to transform the role of teachers according to market-functional ideologies, effectively destroying the historical role of public schools.

Bibliographic notes:

"Educational emergency, school in a globalized society" F. Frabboni.

"Educational sciences and kindergartens" F. Frabboni

"Developmental psychology, knowledge and becoming." Marco Battacchi and Giuliana Giovannelli

http://alternativalibertaria.fdca.it/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center