A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_ _The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours | of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024 | of 2025 | of 2026

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) Australia, ACF Picket Line: Building power in the bush (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Tue, 3 Nov 2026 06:47:42 +0200


ACF members started organising in bush regeneration last year; the industry is ripe for change. ---- I started working in bush regeneration five years ago. I needed a casual job and it seemed to me that, facing a climate crisis in one of the world's leading extinction capitals, it might be the most ethical job imaginable. ---- What I found was an industry full of contradictions. Most of the workers are deeply passionate about the environment and many have advanced degrees in the field. But this passion and knowledge is heavily exploited, with pay only marginally above minimum wage. The conditions are bare minimum, and often genuinely unsafe. I can recall more than a few arguments I've had with management while working on isolated sites, in 35°C heat, about their unwillingness to provide us with water or access to toilets.

I also found an industry at odds with a system that prioritises economic growth above all else.

Bushland management and conservation occupies a niche position in the economy. The industry is reliant on inconsistent funding, with grants coming from various government and council departments, as well as NGOs. Workers in the industry provide an essential environmental service, but it's rarely acknowledged as such.

The results are predictable. Passionate workers develop their skills, they get burnt out, and then they leave the industry. In a way, the low pay acts as a kind of natural filter. You need to be truly passionate about plants and the environment to justify working in bush regen. This has coloured a lot of my conversations with coworkers. We want to turn our shitty casual jobs into careers. We want to stop bleeding away knowledge and experience through high turnover. We want to be paid what we're worth.

Our conditions have a lot to do with how new the industry is. The oldest private bush regen companies date back to the late 80s or early 90s, and the techniques we use from the late 70s. Bush regen has never seen any serious attempt at getting organised. When I started, it was difficult to even find out which union we were supposed to be covered by. For the first few years I found myself paying dues to the wrong one!

Getting organised
Members of the Anarchist Communist Federation began organising in the industry last year. It was a slow start, but signups here and there were incredibly encouraging. It wasn't until 20 people showed up to our first meeting that we really saw the potential for how strong a union could be.

Fast forward to today and we've organised a huge chunk of the workforce at our company, with no sign of slowing. We also have delegates at several other large bush regen companies and it's looking increasingly likely that we'll be bargaining together for a multi-enterprise agreement. We have successfully implemented health and safety representation, and won increases in paid time off.

All of this, for me, comes after years of relatively unsuccessful organising efforts. I spent 3 years at one company trying to organise my coworkers and, in the end, had nothing to show for it. My strategy at the time was one still followed by many segments of the left: "be the loudest, most political person in your workplace."

In hindsight, the result of this strategy was entirely predictable - my coworkers couldn't stand me! I was just "the political guy". The most I achieved for all my work was convincing a couple of coworkers to vote Socialist at the next election.

This time, I tried a new approach. I picked it up from a couple of the ACF's "how to organise your workplace" workshops. I spent time developing my relationships at work and made myself into a reliable and approachable coworker. I didn't spend all my time debating my coworkers' politics, or trying to 'correct them' on every issue. Instead, I appealed to them on the basis of our shared economic interest - the reality of the workplace.

Rather than demand they embrace socialism in one fell swoop, the union allowed us to collectively develop our politics by taking action.

Something that worked really well was finding ways to involve people at different levels of personal capacity. We started up an "activists and delegates group", for those who were interested in putting in consistent work to grow the union.

It helped to chase smaller wins. It's not all about the Enterprise Agreement - you can change a lot about a workplace in the meantime. And every win will be one more thing you can point to to convince people to join up. Every issue, no matter how individual or small, is an opportunity to get more people involved, and to discover the hidden activists in your workplace. From there, you can share the workload of building collective power.

The school of class struggle
Since we got organised, my coworkers have developed a clearer political understanding of both our industry as a whole, and our place as workers within it. Every economic demand that the bosses resist demonstrates the real nature of the workplace under capitalism. It shows people that the power of the ruling class can only be met with the organised power of the workers.

Increasingly, I find that I'm having conversations about how we could change the industry as a whole: How, if workers controlled the industry, we could do things more effectively, equitably, and sustainably.

The process of developing our politics through struggle has raised other questions too. Weeds and biodiversity loss cost the Australian economy money, and the work we do as bush regenerators reduces these costs. But this financial benefit to the economy is minuscule. The benefits will never be enough for governments to justify properly investing in the industry. Government funding is, as much as anything, a way for the ruling class to cover for the environmental devastation they facilitate on a daily basis.

The environmental work that we care about will always be limited and exploited in a system run on profit and commodification. Only by getting organised can we build solidarity across workplaces and communities, demand that our industry get the resources it needs, and win the conditions that we deserve.

https://ancomfed.org/2026/10/building-power-in-the-bush/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center