|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Catalan_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
_The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours |
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2020 |
of 2021 |
of 2022 |
of 2023 |
of 2024 |
of 2025 |
of 2026
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) France, UCL AL #374 - Environment - Ille-et-Vilaine: A Crematorium Project Sparks Controversy! (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
Date
Thu, 8 Oct 2026 08:35:30 +0300
Near Fougères, a proposed crematorium project has mobilized
environmental groups and local residents. At issue is a plan that
threatens the region's drinking water reserves. The situation involves
an administrative muddle that perfectly illustrates how decisions are
made: while several consultative bodies oppose the project, final
decisions are reached in closed-door sessions-which, fortunately, may
sometimes align with local citizens' demands.
Rodolphe Hameau, the mayor of Saint-Germain-en-Coglès (near Fougères),
took the initiative to propose building a crematorium. Although the need
was acknowledged and surrounding inter-municipal authorities had already
begun considering the project, progress had stalled; Hameau effectively
beat them to the punch.
This new project impacts the local environment. A hydrogeologist's
study-conducted when the business park (where the facility would be
located) was first created-had already flagged the site as problematic,
though it ultimately issued a favorable opinion subject to numerous
conditions. Yet, this opinion was not included in the file for the 2025
public inquiry. Why? Likely because it also revealed another glaring
issue: the study noted that the sanitation network was already
undersized and poorly designed, even for the business park activities
originally envisioned.
Despite this, a building permit was granted in late 2025 amidst a lack
of transparency, even as a coalition comprising a local residents'
association and two environmental groups was actively campaigning
against the project with a simple, clear message: "Yes to the
crematorium, but 'no'-not here." Papillon - Fougères SDT Committee
The project is located within the extended perimeter of a drinking water
catchment zone. While the risk of polluting the area and the abstracted
water might have been grounds enough to oppose the project on its own,
other reasons eventually came to light. Let us focus on the core of the
opposition: these specific catchment sites operate at 20% of their
capacity to supply drinking water to the city of Rennes, serving as a
vital local water source. This 20% share is managed by "Eau du bassin
rennais-collectivité," which issued an unfavorable opinion on the
project. The Regional Health Agency also issued an unfavorable opinion,
followed by the Local Water Commission. That makes three unfavorable
opinions-none of which appeared in the public inquiry report! Despite
this, only the mayor and the project developer dug in their heels,
persisting in their joint determination to push the project through
while downplaying the well-substantiated arguments raised against it.
A striking-and bizarrely unsettling-detail is the conclusion reached by
the public inquiry commissioner, who issued a *favorable* opinion! This
perfectly illustrates the level of trust one can place in public
inquiries. They rarely issue negative opinions, overwhelmingly favoring
projects on the grounds that they foster growth. Ultimately, however,
the Departmental Council for the Environment and Health Risks issued a
unanimous unfavorable opinion-a very rare occurrence. Consequently, the
Prefect vetoed the project in June 2026. The developer and the
municipality have two months to file an appeal. Should an appeal take
place, the inquiry commissioner's opinion will be taken into account.
So much for all the other consultative bodies-long live democracy!
Papillon (Fougères local committee of Les Soulèvements de la Terre)
https://www.unioncommunistelibertaire.org/?Ille-et-Vilaine-Un-projet-de-crematorium-qui-met-le-feu
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
- Prev by Date:
(en) Italy, FAI, Umanita Nova #24-26 - Francesco Ponticelli (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
- Next by Date:
(de) France, SocLib: AFGHANISTAN: EIN LAND, IN DEM STAAT, RELIGION UND KAPITAL GEMEINSAM DIE MENSCHENWÜRDE MIT FÜSSEN TRETEN (ca, en, it, fr, pt, tr)[maschinelle Übersetzung]
A-Infos Information Center