|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Catalan_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
_The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours |
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2020 |
of 2021 |
of 2022 |
of 2023 |
of 2024 |
of 2025 |
of 2026
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) UK, ACG, Jackdaw 26 - The Lucas Plan: 50 years on (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
Date
Thu, 24 Sep 2026 09:50:37 +0300
50 years ago the workers at Lucas Aerospace produced an Alternative Plan
as a response to threatened job losses and restructuring. The plan was
developed by the Joint Shop Stewards Combine, representing staff and
manual worker unions on all the fifteen sites throughout the U.K. The
Combine had been established to help great an effective united movement
which could resist management's efforts to use divide and rule tactics.
---- From: https://lucasplan.co.uk/ ---- "Around half of Lucas Aerospace
output supplied military contracts. Since this depended upon public
funding, as did many of the civilian contracts, the Combine argued that
state support would be better put to developing products that society
needed, rather than the state supporting workers through paying
redundancy money when they were put out of work.
Initially the Combine approached outside organisations for suggested
products. After receiving only three replies from 180 outside bodies,
the Combine circulated questionnaires to the workforce requesting
product suggestions which answered a social need and could be produced
using the workforces existing skills and plant technology. Emphasis was
also to be put on the way the products were to be made, making sure that
workers were not to be deskilled in the process of producing them.
150 product ideas were put forward by the workforce. From them, products
were selected to fall into six categories: medical equipment, transport
vehicles, improved braking systems, energy conservation, oceanics, and
telechiric (robotics) machines. Specific proposals included, in the
medical sector, an expansion of 40% in the production of kidney dialysis
machines, which at that time were being manufactured on one of the L.A.
sites. The Combine 'regarded it was scandalous that people could be
dying for the want of a kidney machine when those who could be producing
them are facing the prospect of redundancy'. In the energy sector,
proposals included the development of heat pumps, solar cell technology,
wind turbines and fuel cell technology. In transport, a new hybrid power
pack for motor vehicles and road-rail vehicles. Later, the Combine
produced a road-rail bus, which toured the country."
The plan was rejected. The company refused to change from their
aerospace focus and the government did nothing to put pressure on this
public-funded company. Meanwhile Lucas Aerospace, as a company in its
own right, no longer exists, parts of it having been sold off, while
other parts no longer exist. It is clear then, as now, that profits come
before any strategy to produce products that are actually useful, and
cause no harm.
The current situation, with war fever and a climate emergency, shows
that the vision of the Lucas Aerospace workers is needed more than ever.
The anti-war and environmental movements are largely separate from
workplace organising. However, the movement for the necessary
revolutionary change must be a united one, based firmly in the working
class and willing to not only make demands of government but to
challenge capitalism directly. Those at the point of production, who
have the power to bring everything to a halt, have a critical role.
Imagine port workers refusing to let imported Brazilian soya into the
country. Imagine the fossil fuel workers refusing to work anymore and
demanding full pay until they get alternative jobs.
Unfortunately, many in the current trade union movement, in particular
Sharon Graham of Unite, fully support any industry as long as it creates
jobs. She supports the Third Runway at Heathrow and argues for a
rearmament programme. This shows that she is firmly behind capitalism
where workers can continue to be exploited producing products that cause
misery and destruction for both people and planet.
This is why we need to revitalise the interest in alternative plans,
under direct control of the workers, and which incorporate at least a
vision of a different society.
Workers at the Belfast shipyards, threatened with closure, have plans
for producing infrastructure for renewable energy. In Italy, workers at
a closed car factory are putting proposals forward for an alternative
green production plan.
(https://labourhub.org.uk/2023/12/22/italian-car-workers-fight-for-alternative-green-production-plan/).
We can draw on these examples and take them to other workplaces.
https://www.anarchistcommunism.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/jackdaw_low-res.pdf
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
- Prev by Date:
(de) Italy, FDCA, Cantiere #46 - Ihr Auftrag ist Krieg (ca, en, it, fr, pt, tr)[maschinelle Übersetzung]
- Next by Date:
(en) Italy, Umanita Nova: FAKIR (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
A-Infos Information Center