|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Catalan_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
_The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours |
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2020 |
of 2021 |
of 2022 |
of 2023 |
of 2024 |
of 2025 |
of 2026
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) France, La Platforme: Presidential elections 2027: preparing for them (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
Date
Fri, 14 Aug 2026 07:18:27 +0300
The 2027 presidential election will take place in less than a year. This
deadline is the focus of political activism and journalistic commentary.
Is this a secondary issue for libertarian communists? No! We are not in
the habit of pretending that these deadlines don't exist or that their
outcome has no effect on our lives. --- Certainly, we do not expect an
improvement in living conditions. But we are aware that the outcome
could bring real danger and a regression of social rights, particularly
if the far right comes to power. We are convinced that only social
movements will make it possible, on the one hand, to strengthen the
unity of the working class, on the other hand, to halt social
regression, and finally, to obtain new rights.
Even a victory for a progressive candidate or one claiming to be so will
not bring about social transformation if it is not accompanied by a
large-scale social movement, overflowing that winner and imposing itself
on him or her.
What kind of democracy?
Furthermore, we have no illusions about the bourgeois representative
democracy being offered to us. Certainly, it remains preferable to a
dictatorship or any illiberal regime, if only because it guarantees a
minimum of individual and collective freedoms.
But it is far removed from the democratic ideal championed by
libertarian communism. Democracy is not about giving a blank check for
years to someone who is accountable to no one. Democracy is about
collective decisions resulting from genuine grassroots debates, allowing
both the expression of the diversity of the working classes and serving
as a crucible for the emergence of a common position.
This democracy must be able to take hold at all levels, within a
federalist framework. Elected officials must engage in regular dialogue
with those who mandated them, both to genuinely represent their
aspirations and to provide an account of their mandate, which could lead
to their recall.
Regardless of any personal considerations regarding the candidates, our
interventions as libertarian communists in this period will therefore be
guided by these two fundamental requirements: on the one hand, the
imperative to organize the struggle for social and climate justice; and
on the other hand, to build the social struggle as well as the political
struggle in democratic forms.
The harmful game of parties
However, the race for nominations is upon us, and it is the outcome, and
which candidate wins, that will be decisive. What interests us, of
course, are the candidates claiming to represent the left. With 11
months to go, almost everyone is a candidate or about to become one. The
unity that prevented disaster in the last legislative elections is no
longer on the agenda. Everyone wants to be in the starting lineup, to
elbow their way in, even without any chance, hoping that they or their
camp will emerge as the first among the losers.
Because the real objective of most left-wing candidates is to impose
their organization's hegemony on the left. It's about defending their
party's interests, regardless of the consequences for the working class.
Yet, there will only be losers in this strategy.
The candidate who seems to be in the strongest position today is
Jean-Luc Mélenchon. Like a true neo-Stalinist, he clings to his role as
the party's leader. On the one hand, it must be acknowledged that La
France Insoumise (LFI) possesses real momentum. A victory, or at least a
very high score, for Mélenchon could trigger a social movement.
On the other hand, there are many criticisms and fears: LFI has
significant democratic shortcomings, both in its internal functioning
and in its program; doubts about the ability to keep the promises made
today are real, due to the lack of structure in the LFI apparatus, with
the risk of disappointing or even despairing.
The fundamentals of libertarian communism
It is far too early for the Libertarian Communist Platform or its
activists to take a position. However, we will be paying close attention
to several points:
The contribution to the unity of the working class, and therefore the
ability to bring together the camp of social progress;
The nature of the social dynamic that the candidacy can bring. Even a
candidate who is only left-wing in name brings a different social
dynamic than an openly right-wing candidate;
The policy of defense, strengthening and expansion of public services,
and even socialization of these services;
The policy of worker control over production, therefore the categorical
rejection of privatizations, and possibly the choice to socialize
certain companies;
The fight against global warming, against the degradation of
biodiversity and, from a general point of view, against all pollution
generated by industrial society must be placed at the center of our
struggle;
Immigrant policy: This issue was largely absent from the left during the
municipal elections, with the right to vote for foreigners in local
elections not even being discussed. Immigration will be central to the
presidential campaign, with a race to the bottom in xenophobia between
the center , the right, and the far right. It is therefore all the
more essential to defend clear and uncompromising positions on this issue.
All these reflections concern the first round. However, the aftermath
must be anticipated. First, it is unfortunately very likely that the
question of blocking the election will arise in the second round. Is
this strategy still relevant when far-right ideology has so thoroughly
infected the rest of the political class, particularly on the issue of
immigration?
Next, it is plausible that a dissolution of parliament will follow the
presidential election, with the hope that the new president will obtain
the majority that no longer exists in the National Assembly. However,
securing a majority is far from certain. In a fragmented political
landscape, rife with resentment and even hatred on the left and rife
with betrayals on the right, this " third round of parliamentary
elections " could once again produce an unmanageable situation...
within the framework of the current institutions.
https://plateformecl.org/presidentielles-2027-sy-preparer/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
- Prev by Date:
(en) Italy, FAI, Umanita Nova #21-26 - Hello Manlio (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
- Next by Date:
(en) Germany, Die Platform: Disability in Capitalism (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
A-Infos Information Center