|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Catalan_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
_The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours |
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2020 |
of 2021 |
of 2022 |
of 2023 |
of 2024 |
of 2025 |
of 2026
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) France, UCL AL #371 - Culture - See Raoul Peck: Orwell, 2+2=5 (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
Date
Wed, 24 Jun 2026 08:08:56 +0300
"A collection of Bolshevik and Marxist nonsense," is how one online
review of Raoul Peck's latest film sums it up. Enough to pique one's
curiosity! Especially since its director has previously excelled in both
fictionnotably *The Young Karl Marx*and documentary, including *I Am Not
Your Negro* about James Baldwin, and the miniseries *Exterminate All the
Brutes* about colonization and genocide.
Here we find a technique dear to Raoul Peck: the portrait. In this case,
it's a portrait of George Orwell, with the stated intention of
highlighting his political reflections and offering an
anti-authoritarian and anti-fascist interpretation of his novel *1984*,
often referenced by the far right in recent years. The film presents
Orwell's early years, a pure product of the English colonial
bourgeoisie, born in India, before attending the prestigious Eton
College and then serving for five years in the Imperial Police in Burma.
This introduction is perhaps the best part of the film: it highlights
the thought process of a man who experienced the imperialist machine
firsthand by participating in it, his materialist analysis of
colonialism, and how the primary beneficiaries of an exploitative system
can also choose to rebel against it.
But after this initial success, the film quickly bogs down, lingering at
length on the author's final years, during which he wrote his last
novel, 1984. The director wants to draw parallels between the book and
the contemporary world. One might have feared that the exercise would be
clumsy. And it is. Lost in the intoxication of an otherwise virtuoso
montage, the film ultimately muddles everything, placing all forms of
authoritarianism, all crowds, and all deaths on the same level. The
deluge of images quickly becomes frenetic, jumping from one situation to
another without transition or explanation, and never hesitating to
resort to shocking visuals. The result is a whirlwind of a
demonstration, albeit a chaotic one, with many questionable elements,
such as the heavy-handed insistence on applying the concept of Newspeak
everywhere, and the use of AI-generated imagery: intended to denounce
its use, certainly, but was it a valid reason to employ it? Throughout,
one is left with the feeling of a brilliant director whose message has
been completely sacrificed to style. If one expected to find an answer
to the far right's confusing appropriation of Orwell, one is instead
confronted with an equally confusing vision, but one that claims to be
on the opposite side.
Upon leaving the theater, one question remains: who is the target
audience? Its biases are so pronounced that one eventually understands
how a right-wing viewer, even a moderate one, could see nothing but
"nonsense." Conversely, for those involved in social struggles, it's
difficult to leave without feeling like they've witnessed a lengthy
demonstration of stating the obvious, as enthusiastic as it is futile.
Especially since the film offers no tools to escape the torpor it
plunges us into, merely invoking faith in the people who supposedly
won't renounce their "morality": hard to believe after dozens of minutes
of images of fascist crowds chained together in a strobe-like fashion.
What remains is a film whose sweeping, vague denunciation of the modern
world will surely please the "Télérama left," who can be satisfied with
feeling they're on the "right side of history," and which may resonate
with a few confused individuals, not yet lost to conservative rhetoric.
But otherwise, it's difficult to leave without the unpleasant feeling
that we've spent two hours being told that 2+2 doesn't equal 5. It's
doubtful the demonstration needed to be so lengthy.
N. Bartosek (UCL Alsace)
Raoul Peck, Orwell: 2+2=5, released in theaters on February 25, 2026,
120 minutes.
https://www.unioncommunistelibertaire.org/?Voir-Raoul-Peck-Orwell-2-2-5
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
- Prev by Date:
(pt) Italy, UCADI, #208 - Oriente Médio: Possíveis Cenários (ca, de, en, it, tr)[traduccion automatica]
- Next by Date:
(it) Italy, FAI, Umanita Nova #16-26 - Prosfygika occupata. Resistenza a oltranza ad Atene (ca, de, en, pt, tr)[traduzione automatica]
A-Infos Information Center