|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Catalan_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
_The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours |
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2020 |
of 2021 |
of 2022 |
of 2023 |
of 2024 |
of 2025 |
of 2026
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) Italy, UCADI, #205 - The Liquidation of the Kurds of Rojava (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
Date
Sun, 5 Apr 2026 09:05:35 +0300
Amid public indifference and the sustained silence of the press and
television news, yet another massacre of the Kurdish people is unfolding
in an attempt to bury their aspirations to live in a multiethnic,
multireligious society characterized by gender equality, institutions
owned by individuals and social groups, and essential services such as
schools, healthcare, and economic well-being.
A vast plateau, Kurdistan, extends between Turkey, Iraq, Syria, and
Iran, covering an area of 392,000 km². It is inhabited primarily by
Kurdish populations, as well as Arabs, Assyrians, Armenians, Azeris,
Jews, Ossetians, Persians, Turks, and Turkmen.
This area is politically divided into 190,000 km² in Turkey, 125,000 km²
in Iran, 65,000 km² in Iraq, and 12,000 km² in Syria; it is
predominantly home to 40 million Kurds, 25 million of whom live in
Turkey. Overall, the number of Kurds worldwide is estimated at
approximately 40-50 million, due to the many refugees and political
persecutors who have had to flee to avoid being killed. The languages
spoken by the Kurds are generally those imposed by the states that
govern them, while the use of Kurdish is hindered in every way. Kurdish
is written in various alphabets (Arabic, Latin, Cyrillic).
In Kurdistan, various other languages of Turkish, Semitic, and
Indo-European lineages are also spoken by small minorities. Religious
affiliation is also diverse, with members of different faiths coexisting.
Geographically, Kurdistan is a vast plateau located in the northern and
northeastern part of Mesopotamia. Its economic significance is immense,
as it encompasses the upper basins of the Euphrates and Tigris Rivers,
Lake Van, and Lake Uriah. Whoever controls Kurdistan effectively manages
the region's water resources, its fertile lands suitable for growing
cereals and livestock, as well as one of the world's richest oil reserves.
For these reasons, Kurdistan generates strong economic interests not
only from the states that control its territory, but also from the
United States government (see the oil fields exploited by Conoco
(Continental Oil and Transportation Company)), now part of
ConocoPhillips. This is also true for strategic reasons related to
control of the entire Middle East.
From the above, it follows that making Kurdistan a state would mean
significantly altering the borders of at least four states in an area
undoubtedly riven by some of the most complex interethnic, cultural, and
religious conflicts in the world. Currently, while Iranian Kurds are
part of the complex mosaic that constitutes the Persian state and are
among the most aggressively pushing for political openness in the
Islamic Republic, the Iraqi Kurds have acknowledged the balkanization of
the various areas where the Kurdish population is distributed and have
carved out an enclave for themselves in the autonomous province run by
Mas'ud Barzani, leader of the Kurdistan Democratic Party (Partîya
Dêmokrata Kurdistanê). Life for the Kurdish community in both Turkey and
Syria is particularly challenging.
The Kurds between Turkey and Syria
The Kurdish community is particularly large in Turkey, where it
represents approximately one-fifth of the country's population. The
Kurdish question, like the Armenian question, arose from the very birth
of the Turkish Republic, following the fall of the Ottoman Empire. The
nationalist movement of the Young Turks, led by Kemal Pasha, was able to
assert itself and establish the new state in 1922 only at the cost of
completing the genocide of the Armenian people, begun during the war,
definitively averting the formation of an independent Armenian state, a
decision sanctioned by the Treaty of Lausanne. With the same treaty, it
prevented the establishment of a Kurdistan state, resulting in the
plateau being divided between Turkey, Syria (France as the mandatory
state), Iraq (Great Britain as the mandatory state), and Iran (i.e.,
Persia, under British influence).
The repression of the Kurdish people in Turkey was thus able to
continue, punctuated by numerous insurrections, until the PKK (Kurdish
People's Party) began operating in 1971 and was finally established in
1978. Using Iraqi Kurdistan as a base, it also waged armed struggle
against Turkey, resorting to insurrectionary actions and, when these
failed, even to terrorism, as the Zionists had done to build the State
of Israel.
From then on, while a segment of the Kurds was active politically,
forming parties and running in Turkish parliamentary elections, the PKK
began to develop its own strategy, both political and social.
On the one hand, it aimed to establish an independent Kurdish state, but
at the same time, aware that a nationalist movement was inherently
structurally weak, as such a project would require significant changes
to the borders of at least four states-in a region already balkanized
and contested by the great powers-it believed it would need to be
supported by a profound social revolution. This revolution, by
restructuring the balance of power between classes and social classes,
would simultaneously constitute a cultural, economic, and political
revolution for the entire region, giving the political project of
building an independent Kurdistan state its own identity. For this
strategy to be successful, the project needed to be inclusive of all the
peoples living in the territory.
The solution was found by gradually constructing a federal project, both
libertarian and egalitarian, that envisioned broad territorial autonomy,
a kind of communalism, characterized culturally and politically by
absolute gender equality, to the point that every political and
administrative office was held by a man and a woman. This choice
entailed the armed mobilization of men and women and complete gender
emancipation, and was accompanied by an attempt to build a service
structure for the population, focusing primarily on education and
healthcare.
This type of political project and social structure, if anything,
accentuated the aversion of all the states in which the Kurdish people
are distributed, due to the subversive nature of the proposed order and
its cultural orientation compared to that prevailing in the states of
the region. These states viewed the secular and egalitarian values
affirmed and practiced by the Kurds as an extreme threat, especially
given the Islamist influence of the systems, whether they were based on
a Sunni, Shiite, or Alawite vision of Islam.
Starting from these premises, when the criminal US intervention in Iraq
destroyed the country, dismissing the army and the Baathist officials
who supported Saddam Hussein's government, nascent jihadism was able to
give birth to the Islamic State, establishing the city of Raqqa as
ISIS's capital and expanding its influence into the area occupied by the
Kurds. At that point, for the Kurds, who in the meantime had risen up in
arms and created their own autonomous space, taking advantage of the
Syrian crisis, it became a natural choice to side with all those forces,
including Western ones, that sought to oppose ISIS. This was with the
dual objective of defending themselves from sworn enemies of their
political and social project, and at the same time hoping that by
offering their services to the West, the West would somehow support
their demands, having always declared their support for the
self-determination of peoples.
They hadn't yet understood how deceitful Westerners can be in keeping
their promises, and that gratitude in politics and business is a
nonexistent commodity. Above all, they hadn't understood that the United
States doesn't have allies, but subjects, and therefore would have no
hesitation in sacrificing them for its own interests (it's no
coincidence that Native Americans nicknamed them "forked tongues").
So when, busy holding the survivors of the conflict prisoner and
liquidating ISIS on the battlefield using Kurdish militias, after having
employed them to guard the camps of the jihadists' families and the Al
Aqtan prison, in Raqqa they have now decided to satisfy Turkey's demands
to annihilate the Kurds, using pro-Turkish Islamist militias made up of
jihadists recruited in the camps that have seized power in Syria,
supported and directed by Turkey, and to evacuate the US bases in those
territories, which were supposed to support Kurdish autonomy.
The result is the green light for 73,000 jihadists, ready to rekindle
the violence of Islamic fundamentalism around the world and resume
recruitment for the cause. At their disposal, these Salafist militias
include 9,000 detained jihadist fighters, formerly held in Kurdish
custody. Added to these are 6,500 members of Islamist militias from 42
different countries, also now free, who will contribute to reviving
Islamic radicalism. Completing the disengagement is the fact that the
United States-as mentioned-withdrew from the Tanf base on February 11th.
This base was crucial in destabilizing the Syrian government, countering
Iranian presence, and allowing ISIS to rebuild itself over the course of
eight years. With the fall of the Assad regime and the Iranian
withdrawal from Syria, the United States deemed its role over and ended
its presence in the Syrian desert of Homs, moving its forces to eastern
Syria, where they will continue to maintain control of the oil fields
and oversee the fragile situation in the country's northeast following
the failure of the plan to use the Kurds. It is noteworthy that this
withdrawal comes just days after the Russian army's withdrawal from its
base in Qamishli, which forced them to concentrate on the coast.
The strategy developed by the United States envisions their place being
taken by the Turks, considered the most reliable ally and capable of
controlling the current Syrian regime led by Abu Mohammed al-Jolan, the
former jihadist who has "cleaned up" and rebranded himself as Al-Sharaa,
in an attempt to make people forget his past. This choice, by offering
the Turks the final card to destroy the Kurdish entity (which is not
unwelcome to the four states that host them) and placing Syria under
Turkish aegis, brings that country's troops to the border of the State
of Israel, allowing the United States to balance Israel's unchallenged
control of the area and limit the Zionist lobby's influence on the US
government. Once again in history, the Kurds are victims of the balance
of power between the great powers vying for control of the Middle East
and are being sacrificed, even more so when considering the content of
their social, cultural, and political project. This proves that the
West, which claims to fight in defense of the values of democracy,
freedom, and women's participation, as well as the right to
self-determination of peoples, when it comes to power and business, goes
back on its word, renounces alliances, and crushes peoples.
The Kurdish leadership's (perhaps necessary) mistake was to have trusted
the United States, to have believed in the Israeli plan to fragment the
political order in the Middle East, and in the dream of being able to
shatter the territorial unity of existing states to carve out their own
independent national identity. They failed to fully grasp the
subversive, social and cultural, scope of their goal.
Yet the fact remains that only an inclusive political project that
provides for the equal involvement of different ethnic groups,
linguistic groups, and religious groups can enable peaceful coexistence
and peace in this troubled political, geographical, economic, and
cultural area of the planet.
G.L.
The Kurdish People for the Social Revolution, Political Growth
Newsletter, No. 156 - February 2022, Year 2022; The Flower of
Secularism, Political Growth Newsletter, No. 127 - January 2020, Year
2020; War on Coexistence, Political Growth Newsletter, No. 124 - October
2019, Year 2019.
https://www.ucadi.org/2026/03/01/la-liquidazione-dei-curdi-del-rojava/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
- Prev by Date:
(en) Italy, FAI, Umanita: Train Derailment. A Capitalist Tragedy (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
- Next by Date:
(en) Italy, FAI, Umanita Nova #7-26 - Speaking of consent. Everything we should have known... and what we dare ask today. (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
A-Infos Information Center