A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_ _The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours | of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024 | of 2025 | of 2026

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) Italy, UCADI, #205 - The Liquidation of the Kurds of Rojava (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Sun, 5 Apr 2026 09:05:35 +0300


Amid public indifference and the sustained silence of the press and television news, yet another massacre of the Kurdish people is unfolding in an attempt to bury their aspirations to live in a multiethnic, multireligious society characterized by gender equality, institutions owned by individuals and social groups, and essential services such as schools, healthcare, and economic well-being.
A vast plateau, Kurdistan, extends between Turkey, Iraq, Syria, and Iran, covering an area of 392,000 km². It is inhabited primarily by Kurdish populations, as well as Arabs, Assyrians, Armenians, Azeris, Jews, Ossetians, Persians, Turks, and Turkmen.
This area is politically divided into 190,000 km² in Turkey, 125,000 km² in Iran, 65,000 km² in Iraq, and 12,000 km² in Syria; it is predominantly home to 40 million Kurds, 25 million of whom live in Turkey. Overall, the number of Kurds worldwide is estimated at approximately 40-50 million, due to the many refugees and political persecutors who have had to flee to avoid being killed. The languages spoken by the Kurds are generally those imposed by the states that govern them, while the use of Kurdish is hindered in every way. Kurdish is written in various alphabets (Arabic, Latin, Cyrillic).
In Kurdistan, various other languages of Turkish, Semitic, and Indo-European lineages are also spoken by small minorities. Religious affiliation is also diverse, with members of different faiths coexisting.
Geographically, Kurdistan is a vast plateau located in the northern and northeastern part of Mesopotamia. Its economic significance is immense, as it encompasses the upper basins of the Euphrates and Tigris Rivers, Lake Van, and Lake Uriah. Whoever controls Kurdistan effectively manages the region's water resources, its fertile lands suitable for growing cereals and livestock, as well as one of the world's richest oil reserves.
For these reasons, Kurdistan generates strong economic interests not only from the states that control its territory, but also from the United States government (see the oil fields exploited by Conoco (Continental Oil and Transportation Company)), now part of ConocoPhillips. This is also true for strategic reasons related to control of the entire Middle East.
From the above, it follows that making Kurdistan a state would mean significantly altering the borders of at least four states in an area undoubtedly riven by some of the most complex interethnic, cultural, and religious conflicts in the world. Currently, while Iranian Kurds are part of the complex mosaic that constitutes the Persian state and are among the most aggressively pushing for political openness in the Islamic Republic, the Iraqi Kurds have acknowledged the balkanization of the various areas where the Kurdish population is distributed and have carved out an enclave for themselves in the autonomous province run by Mas'ud Barzani, leader of the Kurdistan Democratic Party (Partîya Dêmokrata Kurdistanê). Life for the Kurdish community in both Turkey and Syria is particularly challenging.

The Kurds between Turkey and Syria

The Kurdish community is particularly large in Turkey, where it represents approximately one-fifth of the country's population. The Kurdish question, like the Armenian question, arose from the very birth of the Turkish Republic, following the fall of the Ottoman Empire. The nationalist movement of the Young Turks, led by Kemal Pasha, was able to assert itself and establish the new state in 1922 only at the cost of completing the genocide of the Armenian people, begun during the war, definitively averting the formation of an independent Armenian state, a decision sanctioned by the Treaty of Lausanne. With the same treaty, it prevented the establishment of a Kurdistan state, resulting in the plateau being divided between Turkey, Syria (France as the mandatory state), Iraq (Great Britain as the mandatory state), and Iran (i.e., Persia, under British influence).
The repression of the Kurdish people in Turkey was thus able to continue, punctuated by numerous insurrections, until the PKK (Kurdish People's Party) began operating in 1971 and was finally established in 1978. Using Iraqi Kurdistan as a base, it also waged armed struggle against Turkey, resorting to insurrectionary actions and, when these failed, even to terrorism, as the Zionists had done to build the State of Israel.
From then on, while a segment of the Kurds was active politically, forming parties and running in Turkish parliamentary elections, the PKK began to develop its own strategy, both political and social.
On the one hand, it aimed to establish an independent Kurdish state, but at the same time, aware that a nationalist movement was inherently structurally weak, as such a project would require significant changes to the borders of at least four states-in a region already balkanized and contested by the great powers-it believed it would need to be supported by a profound social revolution. This revolution, by restructuring the balance of power between classes and social classes, would simultaneously constitute a cultural, economic, and political revolution for the entire region, giving the political project of building an independent Kurdistan state its own identity. For this strategy to be successful, the project needed to be inclusive of all the peoples living in the territory.
The solution was found by gradually constructing a federal project, both libertarian and egalitarian, that envisioned broad territorial autonomy, a kind of communalism, characterized culturally and politically by absolute gender equality, to the point that every political and administrative office was held by a man and a woman. This choice entailed the armed mobilization of men and women and complete gender emancipation, and was accompanied by an attempt to build a service structure for the population, focusing primarily on education and healthcare.
This type of political project and social structure, if anything, accentuated the aversion of all the states in which the Kurdish people are distributed, due to the subversive nature of the proposed order and its cultural orientation compared to that prevailing in the states of the region. These states viewed the secular and egalitarian values affirmed and practiced by the Kurds as an extreme threat, especially given the Islamist influence of the systems, whether they were based on a Sunni, Shiite, or Alawite vision of Islam.
Starting from these premises, when the criminal US intervention in Iraq destroyed the country, dismissing the army and the Baathist officials who supported Saddam Hussein's government, nascent jihadism was able to give birth to the Islamic State, establishing the city of Raqqa as ISIS's capital and expanding its influence into the area occupied by the Kurds. At that point, for the Kurds, who in the meantime had risen up in arms and created their own autonomous space, taking advantage of the Syrian crisis, it became a natural choice to side with all those forces, including Western ones, that sought to oppose ISIS. This was with the dual objective of defending themselves from sworn enemies of their political and social project, and at the same time hoping that by offering their services to the West, the West would somehow support their demands, having always declared their support for the self-determination of peoples.
They hadn't yet understood how deceitful Westerners can be in keeping their promises, and that gratitude in politics and business is a nonexistent commodity. Above all, they hadn't understood that the United States doesn't have allies, but subjects, and therefore would have no hesitation in sacrificing them for its own interests (it's no coincidence that Native Americans nicknamed them "forked tongues").
So when, busy holding the survivors of the conflict prisoner and liquidating ISIS on the battlefield using Kurdish militias, after having employed them to guard the camps of the jihadists' families and the Al Aqtan prison, in Raqqa they have now decided to satisfy Turkey's demands to annihilate the Kurds, using pro-Turkish Islamist militias made up of jihadists recruited in the camps that have seized power in Syria, supported and directed by Turkey, and to evacuate the US bases in those territories, which were supposed to support Kurdish autonomy.
The result is the green light for 73,000 jihadists, ready to rekindle the violence of Islamic fundamentalism around the world and resume recruitment for the cause. At their disposal, these Salafist militias include 9,000 detained jihadist fighters, formerly held in Kurdish custody. Added to these are 6,500 members of Islamist militias from 42 different countries, also now free, who will contribute to reviving Islamic radicalism. Completing the disengagement is the fact that the United States-as mentioned-withdrew from the Tanf base on February 11th. This base was crucial in destabilizing the Syrian government, countering Iranian presence, and allowing ISIS to rebuild itself over the course of eight years. With the fall of the Assad regime and the Iranian withdrawal from Syria, the United States deemed its role over and ended its presence in the Syrian desert of Homs, moving its forces to eastern Syria, where they will continue to maintain control of the oil fields and oversee the fragile situation in the country's northeast following the failure of the plan to use the Kurds. It is noteworthy that this withdrawal comes just days after the Russian army's withdrawal from its base in Qamishli, which forced them to concentrate on the coast.
The strategy developed by the United States envisions their place being taken by the Turks, considered the most reliable ally and capable of controlling the current Syrian regime led by Abu Mohammed al-Jolan, the former jihadist who has "cleaned up" and rebranded himself as Al-Sharaa, in an attempt to make people forget his past. This choice, by offering the Turks the final card to destroy the Kurdish entity (which is not unwelcome to the four states that host them) and placing Syria under Turkish aegis, brings that country's troops to the border of the State of Israel, allowing the United States to balance Israel's unchallenged control of the area and limit the Zionist lobby's influence on the US government. Once again in history, the Kurds are victims of the balance of power between the great powers vying for control of the Middle East and are being sacrificed, even more so when considering the content of their social, cultural, and political project. This proves that the West, which claims to fight in defense of the values of democracy, freedom, and women's participation, as well as the right to self-determination of peoples, when it comes to power and business, goes back on its word, renounces alliances, and crushes peoples.
The Kurdish leadership's (perhaps necessary) mistake was to have trusted the United States, to have believed in the Israeli plan to fragment the political order in the Middle East, and in the dream of being able to shatter the territorial unity of existing states to carve out their own independent national identity. They failed to fully grasp the subversive, social and cultural, scope of their goal.

Yet the fact remains that only an inclusive political project that provides for the equal involvement of different ethnic groups, linguistic groups, and religious groups can enable peaceful coexistence and peace in this troubled political, geographical, economic, and cultural area of the planet.

G.L.

The Kurdish People for the Social Revolution, Political Growth Newsletter, No. 156 - February 2022, Year 2022; The Flower of Secularism, Political Growth Newsletter, No. 127 - January 2020, Year 2020; War on Coexistence, Political Growth Newsletter, No. 124 - October 2019, Year 2019.

https://www.ucadi.org/2026/03/01/la-liquidazione-dei-curdi-del-rojava/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center