A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_ _The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours | of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024 | of 2025

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) Italy, FAI, Umanita Nova #17-25 - Holy Anarchy? No, thanks! (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Mon, 21 Jul 2025 07:34:45 +0300


Intrigued by the title - Holy Anarchy! Demolishing Domination, Embodying Community, Loving the Stranger - I purchased and read Graham Adams's book (Bologna, EDB, 2025). I feel compelled to strongly advise against it and to warn comrades so that they do not commit the same double mistake that I did. Or, at least, choose to do so with full awareness. The book proved to be an objectively tiring read, weighed down among other things by a discontinuous, fragmentary, unsystematic and, at the same time, redundant development of reflections. Each chapter - eight in all - opens with a biblical passage (sometimes even two, to make sure nothing is missing). But the entire text is overflowing with biblical language, scriptural references and images from an illustrated catechism. This is the monotonous conceptual world in which the author moves, thinks and expresses himself: a theological universe in which the anarchy promised in the title dissolves between psalms and invocations. In fact, punctuating everything are 17 hymns - yes, hymns: prayers, songs of praise, supplications - all rigorously composed by the author. The result? A deeply religious, theological and biblical book. But very little anarchist.

Not even one of the classic theorists of anarchism is mentioned: no Bakunin, Proudhon, Malatesta, Goldmann, Kropotkin, Reclus. Nobody. Not even Tolstoy! Zero. The only one to make a fleeting appearance - relegated to four footnotes - is Jacques Ellul. The author's true theoretical references? Two contemporary theologians: his direct teacher, the British Anglican Andrew Shanks, and John Caputo, an American with a Catholic background and founder of the so-called "weak theology". In short, there is no comparison with the anarchist philosophical tradition: during the laborious reading I had the impression of having been deceived and kidnapped, forced to reluctantly attend a seminar on postmodern theology. In the almost three hundred pages there is not the slightest attempt at dialogue with libertarian thought. Only the title is, unfortunately, an effective bait. Moreover, the expression "Holy Anarchy!", with the specificity of the exclamation point, is inspired, as expressly declared by the author, by Robin, Batman's assistant (on p. 19 of the book). These are the author's solid theoretical references.

The author carries out a theological makeover, appropriating the term anarchy to find a better language and freshen up the expression "Kingdom of God". Evidently, "king," "kingdom," terms with a clear gender and top-down connotation, do not have much appeal today, so we start hunting for more catchy and more catchy synonyms. After all, "the language of sovereignty, control, and government is completely inadequate," writes Adams (p. 32).

The heart of the proposal is, essentially, a rebranding: out with "Kingdom of God," on with "Holy Anarchy!" - because even the previous proposal to replace "Kingdom of God" with "family of God" now sounds a bit too much like a parish bulletin. The important thing is, therefore, to update the packaging. But the substance remains the same: we are still talking about adherence and obedience to God. Anarchy is nothing more. (cf. "Whether sacred or holy, the point is that true anarchy is divine: it is a condition, a state of affairs, or a reality in which God's will is done," p. 32). At one point the author even identifies the "Holy Anarchy" with the resurrection of Jesus (pp. 257-258).

The author then attempts to reformulate the image of God, describing him as a divinity who acts through an "extraordinary weakness" (chapter IV). Adams also tries to reconcile this vision with Darwinian evolutionism, presenting God as an incomplete, ever-changing and dynamic being. At the same time, he tries to disentangle the different experiences - both historical and contemporary - in which Christianity has not only been an accomplice or collaborator, but a fundamental and active component in the structures of power, domination and oppression (for example, colonialism). As if that were not enough, in the volume, the term anarchy is at the same time often used as a synonym, albeit in a positive sense, of disorder, incompleteness, mixture, confusion and even impurity (p. 25). However, it overlooks the fact that, according to Proudhon, "anarchy is order without power," and for Reclus "the absence of government, anarchy, is the highest expression of order." But I strongly suspect that the author also ignores these formulations, which nevertheless represent the ABC of anarchist thought.

Adams, who often dwells on biographical details and daily episodes from which he claims to be able to draw great theological revelations, is the pastor of an English Congregationalist Christian church. In the book he speaks of solidarity, of mutual hospitality, of "childhood", of empathic closeness, he urges openness towards the experiences, pain and potential of others (p. 185). He calls for a "space in which people's complaints can be heard" (p. 182). All of which is understandable. The problem, however, is that he completely avoids addressing the solutions in practice and, specifically, the issue of ownership: and the management of resources and means of production. He generically proposes concepts such as "the open palm", "the truth in progress", "the choice of weakness", but never supports the clear option of struggle or conflict. Indeed, he calls for love of enemies (p. 242). It is not surprising, therefore, that the author, in a coherent but perhaps ineffective way, relies on prayer with the hope that his wishes for the present and future world will come true (p. 208).

FT

https://umanitanova.org/santa-anarchia-no-grazie/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center