|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Catalan_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
_The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours |
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2020 |
of 2021 |
of 2022 |
of 2023 |
of 2024 |
of 2025
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) Italy, FAI, Umanita Nova #17-25 - Holy Anarchy? No, thanks! (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
Date
Mon, 21 Jul 2025 07:34:45 +0300
Intrigued by the title - Holy Anarchy! Demolishing Domination, Embodying
Community, Loving the Stranger - I purchased and read Graham Adams's
book (Bologna, EDB, 2025). I feel compelled to strongly advise against
it and to warn comrades so that they do not commit the same double
mistake that I did. Or, at least, choose to do so with full awareness.
The book proved to be an objectively tiring read, weighed down among
other things by a discontinuous, fragmentary, unsystematic and, at the
same time, redundant development of reflections. Each chapter - eight in
all - opens with a biblical passage (sometimes even two, to make sure
nothing is missing). But the entire text is overflowing with biblical
language, scriptural references and images from an illustrated
catechism. This is the monotonous conceptual world in which the author
moves, thinks and expresses himself: a theological universe in which the
anarchy promised in the title dissolves between psalms and invocations.
In fact, punctuating everything are 17 hymns - yes, hymns: prayers,
songs of praise, supplications - all rigorously composed by the author.
The result? A deeply religious, theological and biblical book. But very
little anarchist.
Not even one of the classic theorists of anarchism is mentioned: no
Bakunin, Proudhon, Malatesta, Goldmann, Kropotkin, Reclus. Nobody. Not
even Tolstoy! Zero. The only one to make a fleeting appearance -
relegated to four footnotes - is Jacques Ellul. The author's true
theoretical references? Two contemporary theologians: his direct
teacher, the British Anglican Andrew Shanks, and John Caputo, an
American with a Catholic background and founder of the so-called "weak
theology". In short, there is no comparison with the anarchist
philosophical tradition: during the laborious reading I had the
impression of having been deceived and kidnapped, forced to reluctantly
attend a seminar on postmodern theology. In the almost three hundred
pages there is not the slightest attempt at dialogue with libertarian
thought. Only the title is, unfortunately, an effective bait. Moreover,
the expression "Holy Anarchy!", with the specificity of the exclamation
point, is inspired, as expressly declared by the author, by Robin,
Batman's assistant (on p. 19 of the book). These are the author's solid
theoretical references.
The author carries out a theological makeover, appropriating the term
anarchy to find a better language and freshen up the expression "Kingdom
of God". Evidently, "king," "kingdom," terms with a clear gender and
top-down connotation, do not have much appeal today, so we start hunting
for more catchy and more catchy synonyms. After all, "the language of
sovereignty, control, and government is completely inadequate," writes
Adams (p. 32).
The heart of the proposal is, essentially, a rebranding: out with
"Kingdom of God," on with "Holy Anarchy!" - because even the previous
proposal to replace "Kingdom of God" with "family of God" now sounds a
bit too much like a parish bulletin. The important thing is, therefore,
to update the packaging. But the substance remains the same: we are
still talking about adherence and obedience to God. Anarchy is nothing
more. (cf. "Whether sacred or holy, the point is that true anarchy is
divine: it is a condition, a state of affairs, or a reality in which
God's will is done," p. 32). At one point the author even identifies the
"Holy Anarchy" with the resurrection of Jesus (pp. 257-258).
The author then attempts to reformulate the image of God, describing him
as a divinity who acts through an "extraordinary weakness" (chapter IV).
Adams also tries to reconcile this vision with Darwinian evolutionism,
presenting God as an incomplete, ever-changing and dynamic being. At the
same time, he tries to disentangle the different experiences - both
historical and contemporary - in which Christianity has not only been an
accomplice or collaborator, but a fundamental and active component in
the structures of power, domination and oppression (for example,
colonialism). As if that were not enough, in the volume, the term
anarchy is at the same time often used as a synonym, albeit in a
positive sense, of disorder, incompleteness, mixture, confusion and even
impurity (p. 25). However, it overlooks the fact that, according to
Proudhon, "anarchy is order without power," and for Reclus "the absence
of government, anarchy, is the highest expression of order." But I
strongly suspect that the author also ignores these formulations, which
nevertheless represent the ABC of anarchist thought.
Adams, who often dwells on biographical details and daily episodes from
which he claims to be able to draw great theological revelations, is the
pastor of an English Congregationalist Christian church. In the book he
speaks of solidarity, of mutual hospitality, of "childhood", of empathic
closeness, he urges openness towards the experiences, pain and potential
of others (p. 185). He calls for a "space in which people's complaints
can be heard" (p. 182). All of which is understandable. The problem,
however, is that he completely avoids addressing the solutions in
practice and, specifically, the issue of ownership: and the management
of resources and means of production. He generically proposes concepts
such as "the open palm", "the truth in progress", "the choice of
weakness", but never supports the clear option of struggle or conflict.
Indeed, he calls for love of enemies (p. 242). It is not surprising,
therefore, that the author, in a coherent but perhaps ineffective way,
relies on prayer with the hope that his wishes for the present and
future world will come true (p. 208).
FT
https://umanitanova.org/santa-anarchia-no-grazie/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center