|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Catalan_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
_The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours |
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2020 |
of 2021 |
of 2022 |
of 2023 |
of 2024 |
of 2025 |
of 2026
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) Italy, FDCA, Cantiere #45 - Science, Power, and Patriarchy: The Story of Margarete Traube, a Woman Who Challenged a System Built to Exclude Her - Stefania Baschieri (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
Date
Thu, 23 Jul 2026 08:39:49 +0300
The history of science is often told as a sequence of brilliant
discoveries, the product of brilliant minds who challenged the limits of
their time. However, this linear and celebratory narrative hides a
significant absence: that of women. ---- For centuries, patriarchal
culture has defined science as a male domain, relegating women to the
margins, denying them access to education, laboratories, academies and,
above all, recognition. ---- The exclusion of women from science is
certainly not an accident of history, but the result of a patriarchal
system that for centuries has defined who could produce knowledge, who
could access education, and who could be recognized as a rational and
authoritative subject.
For centuries, women were barred from advanced secondary schools,
universities, scientific academies, and laboratories. The patriarchal
assumption was that women were "naturally" unsuited to abstract thought
or experimentation.
Until the late nineteenth century, European universities were
male-dominated institutions, and women were excluded not only from
studies but also from professorships, research grants, official
publications, and scientific societies. Many female scientists worked
without pay, qualifications, or recognition; and even when women
produced science, their contributions were often attributed to men
(husbands, colleagues, mentors), published under obviously male
pseudonyms, ignored in citations, or considered "assistance" rather than
research. For this reason, many female scientists could only work in
private laboratories or in facilities provided by "enlightened" colleagues.
The story of Margarete Traube, a German chemist who worked in Germany
and Italy between the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, represents an
emblematic case of this systemic exclusion.
Through its history, it is possible to understand how science has never
been neutral, but rather deeply intertwined with the power structures of
society.
Born in 1856 into a family of German Jewish scientists and
intellectuals, Margarete grew up in an intellectually stimulating
environment. Yet despite her talent and informal education, she was
unable to enroll in university because Germany at the time did not offer
women full access to education.
In 1877, she decided to move to Italy, where, despite many
contradictions, women were relatively more likely to be admitted to
universities. In 1883, she graduated from Sapienza University with a
degree in Natural Sciences, becoming one of the first women to earn a
scientific degree.
Traube worked with some of the leading Italian scientists of the time.
His research covered diverse topics, yet was united by a common thread:
the relationship between chemical phenomena and physiological processes.
Her most significant contributions include studies on skin
permeability (forerunners of concepts now fundamental in pharmacology),
research on colloid chemistry (an emerging field that would play a
decisive role in modern biochemistry), but she was forced to carry out
her research and work in private laboratories or with available
colleagues, since academic institutions did not recognize her as having
an official position.
Despite being a brilliant researcher and scientist, Traube never
obtained a professorship or a stable academic position. Her exclusion
certainly wasn't due to the quality of her research, but rather to her
identity as a woman. Many of her contributions are considered
"collaborations" rather than independent research. Her name, therefore,
remains marginalized in official publications.
But the patriarchal structure doesn't just exclude women from scientific
spaces: it defines what counts as science, who can do it, and what
results are considered valid. Margarete is a clear example: her work is
scientifically sound, but institutionally invisible.
Margarete Traube was not only a brilliant scientist, but a profoundly
modern figure: a woman who challenged a system built to exclude her and
who managed to break down the obstacles posed by a patriarchal system
through her scientific excellence, her cultural authority, and her
commitment to women's education.
But Margarete was also an intellectual and a feminist with a strong
vocation for social commitment aimed at the most vulnerable.
Hers was a profound, coherent, and multifaceted commitment, closely
intertwined with her life as a scientist, mother, and cosmopolitan
intellectual. It was not limited to theoretical claims, but translated
into concrete actions, writings, networking, and participation in
organized movements such as the National Women's Union, where she
maintained relationships with other protagonists of Italian and European
feminism, including Sibilla Aleramo and Teresa Labriola.
The main areas of her activism concerned the fight for women's suffrage
and civil rights; she fought for the abolition of marital authorization
(the husband had to approve his wife's legal acts), for the protection
of minors and for greater female autonomy.
One of the most controversial issues was the denunciation of the
professional secrecy requirement for doctors treating venereal diseases
in men, whose consequences affected women (marital contagion). He called
for greater openness on the topic of sexuality and promoted a secular
and unhypocritical vision of reproductive health.
These demands, which were certainly avant-garde in Italy at the time,
where women had very few rights, exposed her to scandal and criticism,
but demonstrated her ability to tackle social issues considered taboo.
Hers was a secular feminism, certainly bourgeois, but rooted in real
life and deeply sensitive to inequalities.
This led her to also deal with broader social issues, coming into
contact, through her niece (a philanthropist and activist), with the
reality of rural families decimated by poverty and malaria in the Agro
Pontino.
At the end of the 19th century, the Pontine Marshes were one of the
poorest and most unhealthy areas in Italy, and the living conditions of
farmers and their families were extremely harsh, with extremely high
infant mortality and a lack of healthcare. It was in this context that
Traube decided to intervene, bringing his science to the poor and those
suffering from malaria: here, his science became political action, not
just research.
He collaborated with doctors and hygienists - including Angelo Celli -
supporting prevention initiatives, health education, quinine
distribution, and improving hygiene conditions.
The fight against malaria in that area was a political and social
battle, because it mainly affected the poor.
Her villa in Anzio, the summer residence of her husband's family, became
a place of support for the most vulnerable. There, she sheltered
children suffering from malaria, young people weakened by poverty, and
women in need; she offered adequate nutrition, rest, medical care, and a
healthy environment near the sea.
Her commitment was particularly directed towards women who were most
affected by poverty, offering concrete support to single mothers, basic
education to girls, and spreading hygiene practices as a tool for
emancipation.
Traube's work in the Pontine Marshes was not simply philanthropy: it was
the expression of a clear political vision according to which scientific
research must serve society and progress must include the most
vulnerable. Through his work, Traube successfully combined science,
ethics, and civic engagement, pioneering a modern concept of science's
social responsibility.
In conclusion, Margarete Traube was not only a brilliant scientist, but
a profoundly modern figure: a woman who challenged a system built to
exclude her. Her life illuminates the power dynamics that shaped modern
science and demonstrates how women's emancipation is essential for
scientific and social progress.
http://www.alternativalibertaria.org
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
- Prev by Date:
(en) Italy, FAI, Umanita Nova #18-26 - Revolution in Hand. Spain 1936: Anti-Fascism, Social Revolution, Self-Management (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
- Next by Date:
(en) UK, AFED, Organise - STATEMENT ON RECENT ATTACK IN NORTH BELFAST (ORGANISE! IWA) (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
A-Infos Information Center