|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Catalan_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
_The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours |
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2020 |
of 2021 |
of 2022 |
of 2023 |
of 2024 |
of 2025 |
of 2026
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) Italy, FDCA, Cantiere #45 - Response to the Anarchist Confusionists and to the "Reply to the Platform" signed by some Russian anarchists Group of Russian Anarchists Abroad with a preface by Petr Arshinov* (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
Date
Tue, 21 Jul 2026 07:45:09 +0300
Preface: The crux of the matter ---- The debate sparked by the
publication of the "Organizing Platform" has so far focused primarily on
its various theses or on the proposed organizational draft. In
appreciating the Platform, neither most of the negative reviews nor many
of the positive ones have ever shed light on its premises: they have
never attempted to uncover the factors that led to its emergence or the
starting point adopted by its authors. Yet these very factors are of the
greatest importance to those seeking to understand the spirit and
significance of the Platform. The text recently published by Volin and
other anarchists, entitled "Reply to the Platform," purporting to
constitute a broad-based critique of the Platform, has failed-despite
its best efforts and its claim to read "between the lines"-to elevate
the debate beyond the level of a banal dispute between arguments
isolated from their context, ineffective in addressing the true heart of
the matter. Given that this "Reply" reveals a complete misunderstanding
of the Platform's theses, distorting their meaning and contradicting
them with sophistries, the Group of Russian Anarchists Abroad, having
acknowledged this alleged rejection, has once again identified a series
of points for criticism. At the same time, the Group has highlighted the
political and theoretical inadequacies contained in the "Reply." The
following comments constitute an examination of the content of the
"Reply." They therefore do not constitute a complement or an appendix to
the Platform. They are intended simply to clarify some of our theses.
Nevertheless, we would like to take this opportunity to highlight some
aspects worthy of consideration by comrades who may be interested in the
Platform for the Organization of Anarchism. We believe that in this way
we can better grasp both the spirit and meaning of the Platform. We
often attribute the defeat of the anarchist movement in Russia between
1917 and 1919 to the statist repression of the Bolshevik Party, but this
is a grave error. Bolshevik repression hindered the spread of the
anarchist movement during the revolution, but it was only an impediment.
Instead, the internal ineffectiveness of the anarchist movement itself
was one of the main causes of the defeat, an ineffectiveness resulting
from the vagueness and indecision that characterized its political
positions on the organizational and tactical levels. Russian anarchism
was unable to develop any firm, decisive, and practicable proposal
capable of addressing the main problems of the social revolution.No
proposal aimed at providing answers to the masses who were waging the
revolution. The anarchists were in favor of taking over the factories,
but they didn't have the slightest, albeit definite, idea about the new
production and its structures. The anarchists extolled the communist
principle "from each according to his ability, to each according to his
need ", but they never hesitated to apply it in practice. In doing so,
they allowed unreliable elements to transform this great principle into
a caricature of anarchism. (It is worth remembering how many swindlers
used this principle as a tool to grab the resources of the community for
their own personal gain during the revolution.) The anarchists discussed
a lot about self-managed revolutionary activity by the workers, but they
were unable to orient the masses, even approximately, towards the forms
that self-management could take: they proved incapable of establishing
reciprocal relations between the masses and the ideological core of
anarchism. The anarchists incited the masses to throw off the yoke of
authority, but they were never able to show them how to consolidate and
defend the revolutionary gains. There was an absence of clear and
incisive ideas as well as specific policies for action on a whole series
of other issues. problems. This is what distanced them from the activity
of the masses and condemned them to historical and social impotence.
This is where we must look to understand the causes of the anarchists'
defeat in the Russian Revolution. We, Russian anarchists, who lived
through the harsh trials of the revolutions of 1905 and 1917, have not
the slightest doubt about this. The obvious evidence of anarchism's
internal ineffectiveness forced us to seek ways to win. We have behind
us twenty years of experience, of revolutionary activity, twenty years
of efforts within anarchist ranks, efforts that have seen nothing but
the defeat of anarchism as an organizing movement: well, all this has
convinced us of the need for a new and meaningful anarchist party, an
organization founded on a homogeneous theory, policy, and tactics. These
are the premises of the "Organizing Platform." If anarchists in other
countries, who, despite not having personally experienced the Russian
Revolution, have even a limited knowledge of it, If they were to
carefully examine the climate within the anarchist movement in their
country, they would inevitably realize that even within their own ranks,
the same internal ineffectiveness that caused the defeat of the Russian
Revolution and that represents a mortal threat to the movement
everywhere, especially in times of revolution, is equally prevalent. And
then they will understand the significance of the step forward that the
"Organizing Platform" represents for anarchism, both in terms of ideas
and in terms of organization and revolutionary construction.
* For the full text, please refer to the text " The Organizational
Platform of Anarchist Communists - origin, debate and meaning" being
published one hundred years after its elaboration by the Group of
Russian Anarchists Abroad (DIELO TRUDA), Paris 1926.
http://www.alternativalibertaria.org
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
- Prev by Date:
(de) Australia, AnComFed: Streikposten - Die Spanische Revolution: 90 Jahre später (ca, en, it, fr, pt, tr)[maschinelle Übersetzung]
- Next by Date:
(en) France, Monde Libertaire - Ideas and Struggles: When Night Falls (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
A-Infos Information Center