A-Infos (en) Italy, UCADI, #209 - What's New - Disunited Kingdom: The Triumph of Instability (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Starmer's resignation confirms the profound crisis of Great Britain, 
which refuses to accept the end of its empire and, eager to rebuild its 
own area of colonial exploitation, aspires to the fragmentation of the 
Russian state, turning its immense territory into a constellation of 
ethnic republics, sufficiently weak to offer themselves up to the 
exploitation of Western European countries, and Great Britain in 
particular. This objective is part of the British foreign policy vision 
(now shared by the entire ruling class of the European Union) and is 
unanimously shared by both the Labour Party and the Conservatives, which 
explains the perseverance and continuity with which it is pursued; it is 
the fundamental reason why Britain has armed and supported Ukraine and 
done everything to provoke conflict with Russia. Historically, Great 
Britain's aggression towards Russia dates back to 1919 and began 
precisely in the Donbass region.
In achieving this goal, England has ended up exhausting its economic 
reserves and weakening itself, especially after the City of London lost 
control of the Federal Reserve's policies.
Today, the United Kingdom has a collapsing economy, a navy made up of 
rusty tramps for which crews cannot be found, while the very unity of 
the Kingdom is faltering under the pressure of regionalism. The crisis 
of its industrial and demographic systems, and the multiethnic 
composition of a large portion of its populations, fuel a state of 
emergency in the country, its education system, and its logistics 
structures, shaking up and challenging the maintenance of public order. 
Cultural and ethnic conflict among residents is at breaking point. Its 
secret services and the hidden apparatus of the state are, or almost, a 
paragon of efficiency.
Starmer's crisis represents the latest stage in a succession of seven 
governments since Brexit and four since the start of the war in Ukraine. 
The fact is that the country's economy is unable to sustain the war 
effort, and therefore the consequences of the negative economic 
situation and budget deficit are being felt by the increasingly degraded 
welfare system, the collapse of privatized public transport, the loss of 
competitiveness of the country's economic system, and the impoverishment 
of the less well-off classes.
The glorious British working class, militarily defeated by the joint 
action of Thatcher and Blair, thought it had found in Starmer the leader 
who could revive the country's fortunes. But he was unable to abandon 
the bipartisan neo-imperialist policy of British governments and today 
he is paying the consequences with failure and resignation, while 
Burnham, a Russian-speaking and pro-Zionist like the entire British 
establishment, is preparing to succeed him. He promises the 
renationalization of transport and the strengthening of the welfare 
system, and has announced that his first trip as prime minister will be 
to Israel.
It's very strange that Starmer hasn't resigned entirely; he will remain 
in charge of current affairs for an as-yet-unclear period of time: 
nothing would prevent Burnham from immediately taking office at Downing 
Street. Perhaps the deep state needs time to educate the new prime 
minister and prevent him from deviating from the expected course of 
forced rearmament, and to allow him to prepare the British people for 
the introduction of an electronic identity card (read: social control 
under the guise of keeping minors away from social media). It will be 
interesting to see shortly whether the resigning Starmer will sign off 
on the defense spending increase: an excellent excuse to avoid passing 
the buck to his successor, or a decision made now to avoid future risks.
In any case, Britain appears to have no alternative, and the choices 
being made will not prevent the consequent rise of the most reactionary 
forces, starting with Farage's Reform party and perhaps including its 
most radical followers, such as the neo-Nazis of Restore Britain led by 
Rupert Lowe, who will bring with them the growth of racial conflict. But 
isn't this what Starmer was preparing for by supporting and fueling 
policies of deporting migrants who are permanently resident in the 
country, along with the rejection of new migrants and illegal immigrants?
Our hope and desire is that the new prime minister will accelerate the 
process that will transform the country into a disunited kingdom.

https://www.ucadi.org/2026/06/27/cosa-ce-di-nuovo-regno-disunito-il-trionfo-dellinstabilita/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S  N E W S  S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en