|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Catalan_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
_The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours |
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2020 |
of 2021 |
of 2022 |
of 2023 |
of 2024 |
of 2025 |
of 2026
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) NZ, Aotearoa, AWSM: What Freedom Actually Requires (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
Date
Sat, 11 Apr 2026 10:32:33 +0300
After all this philosophical work, it is worth being concrete. Not in
the form of a programme, anarcho-communism is constitutionally
suspicious of blueprints, for reasons already discussed, but in the
sense of being honest about the full scale of what genuine freedom
requires. It is a demanding standard. It is worth stating plainly. ----
The most fundamental requirement is the abolition of economic
compulsion. No one should be forced to submit to another's authority in
order to survive. This is not only a moral claim it is the precondition
for everything else. You cannot meaningfully speak of freedom, freedom
of thought, of association, of self-determination, to someone whose
primary daily reality is the need to find and keep employment on
whatever terms are on offer. The communalisation of the means of
production, the genuine socialisation of economic life, not
nationalisation under state control, which merely replaces private
bosses with bureaucratic ones, but real collective ownership and
governance by the communities of workers and users who depend on
production is not a detail of the programme, it is the foundation.
Alongside it, the unconditional guarantee of the material conditions of
life - food, housing, healthcare, education be available to everyone as
a matter of right rather than as rewards for labour market compliance.
But material sufficiency alone does not produce freedom. The second
requirement is the dissolution of hierarchical authority in the
organisation of collective life, its replacement with horizontal,
participatory, genuinely accountable forms of selfgovernance. This
requires more than abolishing the state as a formal institution, it
requires developing, in the actual practices and relationships of
communities, the capacities for collective deliberation and
self-management that centuries of hierarchical authority have atrophied.
People have to learn, in practice and over time, to govern themselves.
This is the work that prefigurative politics attempts, building the
habits, institutions, and cultures of freedom in the present, not
waiting for revolution to deliver them from above.
The third requirement brings us back to the inner dimension developed in
Section 8 that genuine freedom demands the conditions in which people
can develop desires and values that are authentically their own, rather
than adaptations to domination. This means education that cultivates
critical thought rather than compliance, culture that expands rather
than narrows the sense of what is possible, and the kind of community
that supports rather than diminishes the development of each person. It
means taking seriously the axes of oppression, race, gender, sexuality,
disability, colonial history, that compound and intersect with class to
produce specific forms of unfreedom that a purely economic analysis will
miss. Formal equality is not enough, what is required is the active
dismantling of the hierarchies that formal equality papers over.
Finally, and perhaps most importantly, freedom requires that we give up
the idea that it can ever be permanently secured. No institution,
however well designed, is immune to the tendency toward hierarchy and
the accumulation of power. No arrangement, however free at its
inception, maintains itself without ongoing attention, criticism, and
struggle. The permanent revolution that the title of this work's
conclusion invokes is not a call for perpetual violence or instability,
it is a recognition that freedom is a practice rather than a
destination, a relationship rather than a state, something that has to
be renewed in every generation, in every organisation, in every
community that takes it seriously. The moment we stop fighting for it is
the moment we begin losing it.
https://thepolarblast.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/to-be-free-together.pd
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
- Prev by Date:
(en) NZ, Aotearoa, AWSM: Polar Blast - Freedom in Practice: The Twentieth Century and Beyond (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
- Next by Date:
(en) Greece, APO, Land & Freedom - [Thessaloniki] Anti-war demonstration (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
A-Infos Information Center