A-Infos (en) Italy, FAI, Umanita Nova #6-26 - Emma Goldman. Anarchy as a Teacher of the Unity of Life - The Sovereign State as an Instrument of Sovereign Sex-Gender (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

"Anarchy is the only philosophy that offers man self-awareness; that 
holds that God, the State, and society do not exist, that their promises 
are null and void, since they can only be fulfilled by man's 
subordination. Anarchy therefore teaches the unity of life; not only in 
nature, but in man. There is no conflict between individual and social 
instincts, any more than there is a conflict between the heart and the 
lungs.[...]The individual is the heart of society, preserving the 
essence of social life; society is the lung, distributing the element 
necessary to keep the vital essence (i.e., the individual) pure and 
strong." (Anarchy: What It Really Means, 1911. Italics mine.)

Anarchy as a teacher of the unity of life: this formula sums up in a 
nutshell the thought, life, and actions of Emma Goldman, an activist, 
writer, and theorist of anarchism born in Lithuania in 1869 and died in 
Canada in 1940, after spending much of her life in the United States and 
traveling the world, spreading anarchist ideas and practices everywhere.

"Unity of life" means observing and becoming aware of the profound and 
pervasive interconnection between lives, people, and the environment 
(natural and otherwise), an interconnection so visceral that it allows 
for no half measures: to be truly free, we must all be free, together. 
Therefore, the emancipation of the oppressed is not enough; Goldman's 
thought goes further: the liberation of each and every one. Freedom, 
therefore, as the basis for the full realization of Life, understood as 
vital energy, affectivity, and self-expression (recalling the vitalism 
of Nietzsche and others) and as practical, daily, and material life. In 
this regard, for Goldman, anarchy brings a triple liberation: "the 
liberation of the human mind from the control of religion; the 
liberation of the human body from the control of property; and 
liberation from the chains and restrictions of government." (Ibid.)

This vision of life, which today we would call intersectional, lies in 
the originality of Goldman's thought. However, he also defines anarchy 
in a more technical sense as "the philosophy of a new social order based 
on freedom, unrestricted by man-made laws; the theory that all forms of 
government are based on violence, and are therefore wrong and harmful, 
as well as useless." (Ibid.)

Wanting to delve deeper into the intersectionality (ante litteram) of 
Goldman's thought, I share a reflection by Chiara Bottici, speaker at 
the dedicated meeting in the "A Philosopher a Month" series: Goldman 
lived for many years in the US, where mainstream feminism coincided with 
the suffrage movement, itself virtually monopolized by white, 
middle-class women demanding the right to vote. In this context, Goldman 
rejects a feminism that translates solely into the aspiration of women 
privileged by class and "race"/ethnicity to join the ranks of highly 
privileged, powerful white men. Goldman wanted more: she wanted 
everything. Bottici also explored the issue of American feminism, 
recalling that Native American tribes had forms of gynocracy that took 
the form of structures of female organization and self-organization 
through which women could express themselves and act politically. 
Throughout Native American tradition, therefore, the idea that women 
possessed sovereignty over themselves and the community never completely 
disappeared: this awareness survived even the atrocities of 
colonization, surviving in the collective consciousness and becoming a 
standard feminist foundation.

From this point on, Bottici elaborated on the mechanisms of control 
over bodies and genders as an essential element in the construction and 
maintenance of the sovereign state as we know it today. First, Bottici 
observes that in Native American tribes, the distinction between genders 
was fluid and changeable, and gender assignment was often based on 
dreams and not-as is the practice today-on a binary bodily 
sexualization. However, Bottici argues, these modes of gender 
distinction would be unthinkable in the modern era: starting in the 
seventeenth century, the sovereign state emerged as a political and 
economic power structure based on the accumulation of capital and 
resources by an institution that commands and controls a more or less 
vast territory in a homogeneous and widespread manner, in the sense of 
diffuse and pervasive. It is a system born in Europe and exported with 
colonization-for the USA, Bottici identifies the nineteenth century as 
the initial period of development of the sovereign state in the strict 
sense.

https://umanitanova.org/emma-goldman-lanarchia-come-insegnante-dellunita-della-vita-lo-stato-sovrano-come-strumento-del-sessogenere-sovrano/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S  N E W S  S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en