|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Catalan_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
_The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours |
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2020 |
of 2021 |
of 2022 |
of 2023 |
of 2024 |
of 2025 |
of 2026
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) France, OCL CA #355 - Elections, a trap for... Cameroonians! (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
Date
Tue, 20 Jan 2026 07:09:14 +0200
A Central African country with a population of 30 million and
independent since 1960, Cameroon rarely makes headlines in the French
media except for its national football team, its internationally
renowned musicians... or, ironically, for its President. Paul Biya, 92,
has not only been in power for 43 years, but he also rules Cameroon like
a despot from a hotel in Geneva, where he spends half his time.
According to national and international experts, Issa Tchiroma (1) won
the presidential election of October 12 - but Biya has nonetheless
secured another seven-year term.
Once again, a wave of hope for profound change had swept through
Cameroon: large segments of the population had mobilized to put an end
to the electoral charade, with its predetermined results, and vigilance
committees had been created to monitor the vote. Then, during the two
weeks when Biya hesitated to release the results-which were, as usual,
rigged-a palpable tension and simmering anger were felt: how would the
Cameroonian masses react? But Biya has proven, in a bloody fashion, for
decades that he knows how to crush popular uprisings. His latest victory
has embarrassed the French government, as Foreign Minister Jean-Noël
Barrot acknowledged it while invoking respect for fundamental democratic
rights. While his statement clashes somewhat with the unconditional
support France had previously given Biya, Paris will nonetheless refrain
from imposing any sanctions against him. There is no question, for
example, of halting the delivery of weapons used against the
demonstrators, particularly those supplied by the French security
company Alsetex. The French press participates in this complicity with
Biya's bloody regime by rarely mentioning Cameroon (with the exception
of publications labeled left-wing, progressive, or revolutionary). It
ignores both its struggle for independence (see box), with its tens of
thousands of deaths, and the country itself.
Furthermore, Cameroonian opposition figures, all of whom are in a
precarious organizational state, struggle to even discuss their battles.
Many parties boycott presidential elections, regardless of their
ideological positions, because they are unable to participate and fear
that their candidate's candidacy will be invalidated.
Uprisings against the "democratorship"
Upon assuming power in 1982, Biya reorganized the hierarchy of the
presidential guard and the army, favoring his cronies and sparking
discontent (particularly in the north of the country, the region of his
predecessor). A coup attempt was made against Biya in 1984, but it
failed. The regime hardened: soldiers were executed, and Issa Tchiroma
was imprisoned for six years, wrongly accused of participating in the coup.
In 1991-1992, the "structural adjustments" imposed by the IMF sparked
popular discontent, and a new form of protest emerged: the "ghost town"
movement, a kind of general strike. Furthermore, a democratic wave swept
across the African continent, and national conventions for political
pluralism were held in various countries. Biya pretended to make
concessions, but the presidential election against John Fru Ndi was
rigged. From then on, young people labeled the regime a "democratorship."
A new wave of protest arose with the global subprime mortgage crisis in
2008. In the so-called "Global South," it had a significant impact on
the price of basic foodstuffs (2). So, when Biya seized the right to
rewrite the Constitution by removing presidential term limits, there
were calls for strikes and demonstrations across the country,
particularly in Douala. But the repression was swift: more than 2,000
arrests and at least a hundred deaths.
In 2016, the conflict that erupted was reminiscent of the war of
independence: the Anglophone region of Cameroon rose up in response to
the contempt and social marginalization it suffered at the hands of the
Francophone central government in Yaoundé. Faced with a strike movement
launched by lawyers and teachers, the government resorted to force. In
response, Anglophone activists took up arms and declared the
independence of the Anglophone region under the name Ambozonia. This
conflict continues to this day, but it is largely silenced (unlike the
fight against Boko Haram, which has been waged since 2013 in the Far
North of Cameroon). It is the Rapid Intervention Battalion (BIR) -
created by Israeli mercenaries after the failed coup of 1984 - that
carries out the most important military operations (3).
In the 2018 presidential election, Biya faced Maurice Kamto, who
declared victory before the official results were published... and was
imprisoned for several months. However, Kamto's campaign and candidacy
rekindled the interest of the Cameroonian population, particularly a
segment of its youth, in political engagement. Kamto appealed to the
Constitutional Council for three days to contest Biya's re-election, and
this action, broadcast on television and social media, helped expose the
fraudulent voting techniques.
This political engagement materialized in a desire to organize through
collectives and networks, as well as to mobilize in the streets on
several occasions: in 2019, 2020, and 2022. But each time, the
authorities banned the demonstrations and arrested those who
participated, effectively stifling any attempt at organization.
The government's inflexibility in the face of popular anger
For the 2025 presidential election, tensions and clashes nevertheless
erupted across Cameroon from October 12 to 26, starting with the first
round of voting, even though the regime was monitoring, controlling, and
making preemptive arrests. All the cities were in turmoil because, from
Bafoussam to Douala, passing through Limbe and Dschang, it was observed
that ELECAM (4) agents were rigging the votes. Some of them were
violently assaulted by the population. Then, the public attacked the
headquarters of the presidential party, targeted members of the regime,
tore down posters of the President, and set fire to symbols of power.
Tchiroma, who was imprisoned and surrounded by the army, was declared
the winner. The Cameroonian people thus attempted to establish a balance
of power against the government.
The day before the results were announced, various organizations called
for demonstrations in several cities. But the police fired on the
protesters, and the official death toll rose to four.
Douala, the country's economic heartland, is the city of major popular
mobilizations. This is why the regime harshly repressed any unrest in
the proletarian slums there. Starting with the emblematic "New Bell,"
which it cordoned off to fire live ammunition at the demonstrators. But
it did the same in other working-class neighborhoods of Douala and
Yaoundé: wherever there were gatherings or demonstrations, the police
and army were out in force, along with tanks.
To avoid being shot, some demonstrators waved white flags, but all the
while chanting a slogan not without irony: "Everyone suffers, even the
poor (5) suffer."
The government launched a propaganda campaign against the looting of
shops, gas stations, and pharmacies, resorting to the familiar rhetoric
of panic, also well-known in France. It also used discriminatory
language against the northern population, exploiting tribal and ethnic
divisions. Calls for a general strike and economic shutdown were issued
by Tchiroma. These calls were heeded in several cities, but they lacked
the intensity of the protests of the 1990s, and did not have the desired
political impact on the government. Nevertheless, the government felt
compelled to communicate through the media and social networks to
reassure "economic actors": nothing was happening in Cameroon, and the
economy was doing well. Prefects and high-ranking civil servants
traveled to Cameroon to shake hands with some business owners in an
effort to reassure capital.
Repression, an old story
A German colony from 1884 to 1918, Cameroon was officially entrusted to
France and England, under an international mandate from the League of
Nations (the precursor to the UN), to guide the territory towards
self-determination. In reality, France made it its model colony.
After contributing to the defeat of Nazism during the Second World War,
many African soldiers returned to their countries hoping for improved
living conditions, or even the end of the colonial system. A powerful
trade union movement emerged in Cameroon in 1944, supported by French
communist and internationalist activists living there. In 1948, Ruben Um
Nyobé founded the independence movement UPC (Union of the Peoples of
Cameroon - the country is indeed home to many ethnic groups).
Edgar Faure, President of the Council in France, banned the UPC in 1955.
Riots broke out in Cameroon, but the repression was fierce, with
hundreds killed in Douala. The UPC went underground, and France waged a
veritable war against it: creation of pro-French militias, hunt down
guerrillas, assassination of nationalist leaders (such as Um Nyobé and
Félix Moumié), bombings, torture, etc. But, unlike the Algerian War,
which was taking place at the same time, this war was deliberately
concealed by French politicians, determined not to relinquish control in
Cameroon as they had in Indochina.
When Cameroon finally gained independence under pressure from the
resistance fighters, France installed the puppet regime of Amadou
Ahidjo. As the High Commissioner to Cameroon, Pierre Messmer, wrote in
his memoirs: "We will grant independence to those who demanded it the
least, after having politically and militarily eliminated those who
demanded it with the most intransigence." The last resistance group was
dismantled in 1971, and Ernest Ouandié, the last historical leader of
the UPC, was executed in the public square after a sham trial. A pall of
repression descended upon Cameroon, and one of the most formidable
dictatorships in Francophone Africa took hold, thanks to the efficiency
of a political police force and an army trained by torturers in Algeria.
In 1982, Ahidjo was replaced by his Prime Minister, Paul Biya...
A possible continuation of popular resistance?
Seeing young people reclaiming the long-hidden war of independence and
drawing parallels between their impoverished social conditions and the
dictatorship they experience daily, one might think that history will
serve as a compass for Cameroonian youth. More broadly, the political
break between a large segment of the population and the Biya regime is
complete. Certainly, human rights and progressive organizations (such as
the Stand Up For Cameroon platform (6), which includes what remains of
the UPC today) have reported 40 deaths and 2,000 detainees related to
the recent post-election protests. But despite the repression, something
of these protests should remain.
Furthermore, Tchiroma continues to proclaim himself President and is
playing his hand by fanning the still-smoldering embers of popular revolt.
However, the regime is still holding on, and there is no palace coup in
sight, no credible alternative to Biya within the inner circle, as
happened in Gabon. We are simply witnessing the growing influence of the
Secretary to the Presidency, Ferdinand Ngoh Ngoh. He is the one leading
the current repression. He is also the one who runs Cameroon with a
myriad of clientelist clans drawn from the various ethnic bourgeoisies
(including traditional chiefs) that make up the country and share common
interests with the regime in power. To complete the picture, we mustn't
forget to mention President Macron who, despite the disputes between the
Bolloré Group and the Cameroonian state over control of the port of
Douala, still desires a French economic, diplomatic, military, and
cultural presence in Cameroon.
Alfano, November 24, 2025
Notes
1. Tchiroma has served as a minister under Biya on several occasions,
most recently until last June.
2. 23% of the population lives below the poverty line, and nearly 60% of
this population is under 35 years old.
3. This partly explains the regime's position on the Palestinian
question, namely the absence of any resolutions passed in favor of the
Gazan and Palestinian populations in general. Security support in
exchange for diplomatic support. This runs counter to the views of the
overwhelming majority of Cameroonians, who are largely in favor of the
Palestinian cause.
4. Electoral commission tasked with overseeing the election.
5. Police.
6. Read the article "In Cameroon, taking to the streets for change,"
published in Courant alternatif in February 2022, on
oclibertaire.lautre.net.
http://oclibertaire.lautre.net/spip.php?article4585
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
- Prev by Date:
(en) Italy, FAI, Umanita Nova #36-25 - Hospitals Go to War. Militarized Healthcare in Italy, France, and Germany (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
- Next by Date:
(en) Italy, UCADI #203 - The Triumph of Hypocrisy (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
A-Infos Information Center