|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Catalan_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
_The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours |
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2020 |
of 2021 |
of 2022 |
of 2023 |
of 2024 |
of 2025
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) Brazil, OSL: Against US imperialism, our response is internationalism and class struggle! (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
Date
Wed, 10 Sep 2025 08:47:42 +0300
In a powerful imperialist attack, the Donald Trump administration
announced a 50% tariff on a large portion of Brazilian products exported
to the United States, aiming not only to expand the hegemony of US
companies but also to exert political pressure on the Brazilian
government. The 50% tariff hike was subsequently "adjusted," exempting
approximately 700 Brazilian products. This action, however, far from
being a mere technical adjustment or an isolated episode of a trade
dispute, is part of the broader project of global domination by the US
ruling classes, a concrete expression of contemporary imperialism. From
an anarchist perspective, we denounce this US aggression while
understanding that the interests of the Brazilian ruling classes lie in
taking advantage of this moment to deepen the exploitation of the
working class within the country.
Nothing new on the front: tactics change, but the strategy remains.
The taxation in question should be understood as part of a long history
of economic and political impositions that seek to maintain US hegemony
in the international system. This hegemony was consolidated after the
end of the Cold War, especially following the Wolfowitz Doctrine, a
project of US global supremacy, with no room for equal negotiations with
other powers or for the self-determination of peoples. It operates in a
multifaceted manner, through: a) the supremacy of the Wall Street
financial market; b) the imposition of the dollar as a global currency;
c) the international dissemination of neoliberal ideology; and d)
imperialist intervention in peripheral territories and economies. The
taxation of Brazilian products is just another tool in this imperialist
economic offensive, which, depending on the particular characteristics
of the government in power or immediate needs, maintains its strategic
orientation.
The measure should also be understood in the context of systematic
political blackmail by US imperialism. While imposing trade sanctions,
the US government-through its diplomatic, intelligence, and business
networks-seeks to directly interfere in the Brazilian political
situation, attempting to pressure authorities and Supreme Court justices
regarding the trial of former President Jair Bolsonaro. This
demonstrates that, beyond economic, the imperialist offensive also has a
legal-political dimension, serving the interests of sectors of the local
and foreign ruling classes who see Bolsonaro as a strategic asset for
reorganizing the far right in Latin America. To this end, they leverage
the subservience of political agents of the Bolsonaro family and their
allies in the United States and Brazil.
The interests of "big tech" and technological, economic, and ideological
control
Within this context, we are witnessing the growing activity of the US
big tech lobby (such as Google, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, and Apple),
which not only profit from data extraction and the precariousness of
labor relations on a global scale but also have political influence in
Brazil. They influence legislation, shape public discourse, and impose
agendas that run counter to digital sovereignty, the bourgeois
democratic rule of law, and the self-determination of peoples. The
interference of these technology corporations, with direct support from
the US state apparatus, represents yet another dimension of contemporary
imperialist domination, which combines technological, military,
political, economic, and cultural-ideological control.
Indeed, what lies behind Trump's measure is not only the protection of
US domestic industry, but the direct defense of the economic and
political interests of business groups like Meta and Google, Visa and
Mastercard, which lobby against any attempt at digital, financial, or
commercial autonomy for countries like Brazil.
Furthermore, everything indicates that the 50% tax on Brazilian products
is also a geopolitical and corporate retaliation aimed, among other
things, at sabotaging the Brazil-China agreement for the construction of
a railway connecting Brazil's Central-West region to the port of
Chancay, Peru, managed by the Chinese state-owned company Cosco. This
project would reduce the time taken for Brazilian exports to Asia by
approximately ten days, reducing dependence on the Atlantic route under
US hegemony and thus weakening US dominance over global logistics and
trade chains.
The measure also serves as a response to the Brazilian government's
recent stance, which-at least in its rhetoric-has championed
multilateralism and questioned the dollar's exclusive role as the
international reference currency. Even though, at present, these
statements are unaccompanied by concrete measures and the Brazilian
government remains submissive to local and international ruling classes,
the mere gesture of suggesting a world less dependent on the United
States has generated harsh reactions from US imperialism and its
corporate representatives.
And where are the people?
The Brazilian government adopts a cosmetic discourse of
"non-submission," attempting to construct the image of an autonomous and
assertive foreign policy that appeals to various sectors of the
progressive left. However, in practice, it continues to operate within
the limits imposed by the national ruling classes and tacit agreements
with imperialist centers, without any dialogue or participation from
organized sectors of the working class and oppressed classes. This
policy is top-down, based on economic calculations and the interests of
large corporate groups, rather than on popular self-determination or the
protagonism of the exploited majorities. It's no surprise that Haddad
has already signaled that he will include the North American exploration
of rare minerals in Brazil as a bargaining chip in the negotiations, to
safeguard the interests of the national bourgeoisie. Among the sectors
harmed by the tariffs are large conglomerates led by Brazilian
billionaires, largely responsible for the country's profound social
abyss. A significant portion of these companies are publicly traded,
with international shareholders.
We reaffirm that our fight against imperialism should not be confused
with any nationalist defense or a defense of Brazilian "sovereign
capitalism." Even though the current opposition of interests between
foreign and national capital and the state's willingness to protect
local entrepreneurs are the order of the day, what will ultimately be
served at the dinner table will be the body and soul of the working
class. The Brazilian bourgeoisie, complicit in and beneficiary of this
domination, will never represent a real alternative to external
domination. Any defense of national sovereignty that involves alliances
with the bourgeoisie or lacks anti-capitalism as a strategic element
contributes to sowing illusions among the oppressed classes and
diverting them from the class struggle. The wealth that remains in the
country continues to be appropriated by this same elite that keeps the
people in poverty, informality, and under the yoke of the State and
neoliberal policies.
We therefore reject any interpretation that treats imperialism merely as
an "external oppressor" without exposing the active role of the local
ruling classes in this process and their subordinate association with
imperialist interests. What is at stake is not only the economic
sovereignty of a nation-state, but the concrete conditions of
exploitation and expropriation experienced by the oppressed classes in
Brazil and around the world. Our critique stems from the class struggle,
not from bourgeois nationalism.
We advocate:
Denouncing US imperialism and dismantling its instruments of global
domination, such as arbitrary protectionist tariffs, military bases,
NATO, the IMF, and other international institutions subordinated to its
control.
Directly confronting the effects of US imperialist domination in Brazil,
such as submission to the interests of transnational corporations, the
financialization of the economy, the Big Tech lobby, the systematic
plundering of our natural resources, and the overexploitation of the
workforce.
Building an anti-imperialism with a socialist and libertarian base,
which distrusts alliances with competing capitalist blocs (such as
China, Russia, or BRICS) and proposes an internationalist strategy of
solidarity and struggle among the working classes and oppressed peoples
worldwide. Criticism of the connivance of the current government
responsible for managing the Brazilian state, which, under moderate
rhetoric of "national independence," continues to serve the interests of
big capital, without listening to, consulting, or engaging with the
popular sectors and their organized movements.
Understanding that the struggle against imperialism must go hand in hand
with the struggle against statist capitalism and all forms of domination.
Active and revolutionary solidarity with the oppressed classes in the
United States itself, who also suffer under the yoke of their
imperialist ruling classes. These workers are not our enemies, but
potential allies in the construction of a new social order based on
self-managed popular power, solidarity, and the abolition of class,
national, and private property boundaries.
Finally, we reiterate that our struggle is not limited to criticizing
yet another attack by the US empire, but to building a socialist,
internationalist, and libertarian alternative to the system that
sustains it. Our response to the imperialist frenzy of Trump and his ilk
will not be to demand the closure of trade borders or the strengthening
of the bourgeois nation-state, but to organize the oppressed classes in
every corner of the world toward the demolition of imperialism and
capitalism in all their forms.
For internationalism, for libertarian socialism, against imperialism and
statist capitalism!
Libertarian Socialist Organization
August 2025
https://socialismolibertario.net/2025/08/05/contra-o-imperialismo-dos-eua-nossa-resposta-e-internacionalismo-e-luta-de-classes/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
- Prev by Date:
(en) Italy, UCADI #199 - The Sacking of Cities: Milan Like So Many Others (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
- Next by Date:
(ca) Spaine, Regeneration: Impulso pasa a integrarse en Liza Por LIZA PLATAFORMA NARQUISTA DE GRANADA (de, en, it, pt, tr) [Traducción automática]
A-Infos Information Center