A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_ _The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours | of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) France, Monde Libertaire - He runs, he runs the rebel... (Part 1) (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Tue, 19 Nov 2024 08:21:14 +0200


Memory of antimilitarist struggles ---- Our friend Franck Thiriot, regular contributor to Le Monde Libertaire, sent us a text recounting his years of rebellion in the immediate aftermath of 1968. ---- This text is rich in political anecdotes and human testimonies about a time that is now somewhat distant... But this text is very long and would perhaps deserve the publication of a brochure. ---- Rather than deprive ourselves of this historical, but above all human, dimension, we have decided to offer it to you in several parts, in the manner of the serials of 19th century newspapers.

We hope that this publication "in episodes" will not make the text lose "some of the intimacy of style, the dynamics and the militant enthusiasm that was both tenacious and joyful that was that of the time" to quote the author, "just the testimony of an actor in the antimilitarist struggles of the time."

As soon as the law of December 21, 1963, relating to Conscientious Objection and its legal status was passed, obtained thanks to the fight of Louis Lecoin, Michel Debré, then First Sinister of de Gaulle, did everything to hinder it and reduce its scope. The first beneficiaries of the Status had to lead many movements in order to no longer depend on the various paramilitary assignments (civil protection and militarized firefighters), to finally obtain the right to carry out their time of Civil Service - already double the armed service - within non-profit general interest associations of their choice. This provision allowed them until then to express their opposition, while working with those left behind. However, by depending on the General Defense Organization (Ordinance 1959) they could still be judged by the furry cats of the Permanent Tribunals of the Armed Forces.

Thanks to the battles fought in 1968, with a dozen imprisonments to boot, they would finally depend on the civil courts. As early as 1970, the State initiated a series of trials against anti-militarist activists charged under the fiftieth article of the law governing conscientious objection... an article prohibiting public knowledge of it, whereas according to bourgeois doxa: "ignorance of the law is no excuse".

The prosecutions would extend over a decade, like the arbitrariness of this Jurisdictional Commission (CJ) alone authorized to recognize young anti-militarists as having the benefit of the legal status of objector.

Suddenly, a filth from behind the bundles of sabre-draggers fell on our lemons: the Brégançon Decree. President Georges Pompidou, former head of the Rothschild Bank, sad fool, Poupou-les-Gros-Sourcils who will spend his seven-year term letting his belly grow until it explodes, signed the Decree published on September 2, 1972 in the Official Journal...

Attacks and counter-attacks.

I don't want to spoil the plot, but you still have to dig and stir the sauce a little to understand the affair. So here it is: in September 1972, Operation 20 was launched at the initiative of two dozen young long-haired-bearded men determined to obtain the Status from twenty individual requests, all written in the same terms since "the law is the same for everyone". (I hear laughter...) Some will be accepted, others rejected. The Council of State will overturn the decision of the CJ badgers in February 1973, while the Group of 20 grew to 1,120 people. New grouped requests and new stubborn refusals, because: "requests based on reasons foreign to the scope of the law".

So, one morning at dawn, the studded shoes of Vénissieux, near Lyon, came out of his stake Bernard Chorin to put the metal bracelets on him, heading for the nearest citadel of silence. He was the fourth activist to be arrested in the fight against this dangerous Operation 20 threatening nothing less than the very fragile "security of the State". The air is frightening... Other dangerous hairy subversives of the same ilk will soon be put out of harm's way.

At the same time, this explains the Pompidolian stress: more and more recalcitrant conscripts refuse to respond to their route orders, without having requested, due to lack of information, the benefit of the Status, instantly transforming themselves into so many total insubordinates.

The number of objectors increases each year (Le Monde reported in 1972 more than one hundred monthly requests). Report of anguish. The government, panicked, brushes in the berdouille after having worked for weeks of pulling out hairs like a yeti, launches with this Decree of Brégançon a new offensive worth its weight in old-fashioned mustard:
Article 2 in fact translates a firm will of paramilitary regimentation by prohibiting "any statement contrary to the interests of the Nation" (translate: "of power") by removing their political, union, assembly, expression and strike rights (articles 7 and 8) while assigning them to residence within specific geographical limits.

A real provocation. Red rag to the bull. In the process, the beer bag Minister of Agriculture Chirac, future Jacquouille la Fripouille, who has ministerial supervision of the objectors, has the nerve to authoritatively assign the objectors to the National Forestry Office (ONF) for at least the first year of their Civil Service. The philosophy of this measure: to lose them in the middle of dark forests like Tom Thumb for speeches to squirrels, throwing hazelnuts being less bold than throwing paving stones... The ONF is an industrial and commercial establishment, whose main goal is the search for maximum profit.

"The forest has become an economic tool of the Nation, which implies that it is managed like a field of peas or tomatoes, based on the certainty that, if we invest in the forest, we can make money there." (Mr. Cointat, former Minister of Agriculture.)

"We must, at all levels, create an obsession with productivity." (Mr. Delaball, General President of the ONF, in January 1970).

Clearcutting of oaks and beeches then gave way to plantations of coniferous species, wrongly considered more profitable than hardwoods and better corresponding "to the needs of the paper industry" (dixit). Conifers impoverish humus, fauna and flora, are poorly resistant to storms, frost, snow, fire, insects, etc. What followed would prove that the growth rate was largely exaggerated and the economic profitability expected, even in the short term, totally illusory.

The few hundred and sixty naive people who initially accepted the authoritarian assignment would quickly bite their fists and feet, because the lawsuits would multiply against these lucky people: refusal to obey, abandonment of post, strike, etc. Sanctions: fines, suspended prison sentence and obligation to return to the place of assignment under threat of lifting the suspended sentence. By dint of wanting to go ever further in the repression, the elastic too tight will end up snapping the government's mug. The insubordinations to the ONF will multiply very quickly: more than four hundred soon and new indictments will follow in the wake. Great! The refractory objectors now having Support Committees everywhere, but no structure to organize the national coordination, I will now lead with a few friends the Secretariat of Conscientious Objectors (SOC), at 6 impasse Popincourt in the 11th. Our mandate: to set fire to by challenging the authoritarian assignment and demand the pure and simple repeal of the Brégançon Decree.

Since until now the SOC was withering away like a wall crumbling in the humidity, we are going to revive it by undertaking actions that will replenish the wounded young hearts.

The first, admittedly lacking in originality, constitutes a very concrete short-term objective, a tonic gymnastics exercise: a petition "directed towards the artistic and literary world". Nothing but the classics to gain visibility in various cultural circles, "opinion relays". That should throw a little sand in the government's couscous. I obtain from May Picqueray, a family friend, a list of several dozen names and addresses of writers, painters, etc., with a view to having our petition demanding "the repeal of the Brégançon decree and the authoritarian assignment to the ONF" of conscientious objectors signed, which will be published in the press and given to the minister-ugh! Among the many signatories I visit at home, Prévert in the Cité Veron addresses me informally and invites me to have a snack, while the widow of Albert Camus, broom behind her door, will simply throw me out. Widow Camus must not have taken the time to read Albert... Prévert, with his wet cigarette constantly held in his mouth, is interested in the subject other than out of politeness: objectors, rebels, deserters, the refractory, that concerns him. Happy Jacques, poor Albert... From François Cavanna and the Charlie-Hebdo team, the support will be constant.

Emerges from the bowels of freedom.

The dailies Libération and Le Monde will echo the anti-militarist struggles, closely covering the trial (28.11.73) of the twenty-six-year-old journalist Christian Raspiengas, member of the Bordeaux Nonviolent Research Group, who benefits from the support of Jean-Marie Muller, writer of Nonviolence, creator of the MAN (Nonviolent Action Movement), and the intervention of Jacques Ellul, professor at the University of Bordeaux, known for his work.

Having received his roadmap in March, Raspiengas will perfectly summarize the situation and the denials of rights during his trial, triggering the black anger of a prosecutor stuck on his own ground: "Only his impetuosity and a harmful idealism can plead in favor of the accused."

The situation is becoming radicalized very quickly, support committees are being created everywhere, at the initiative or not of our young secretariat (SOC): an Antimilitarist Committee (CARM) in Oullins, a Letter from Objectors in Lyon, etc. The courts are struggling to keep up, but convictions are raining down as in Gravelotte on the heads of long-haired people asked to number their abatis.

Requests for Status are multiplying exponentially while refusals from the Jurisdictional Commission are becoming more and more systematic and hypocritical, like hide your hard bread, I'll eat my meat. It's a tough fight. The reasons most often given to be successful, hoping to stem the phenomenon: reasons given not falling within the scope of the law; request written according to a stereotypical model; reasons given deemed political; absence of reason. This is the dark transparency of military institutions.

Philippe Lebaudy, from Saint-Étienne, had to appear before the military court in Lyon (18.09.1973) after two hunger strikes of forty-four and twenty days. In Arras, four young anarchists were charged with "insulting the army by means of a poster" of the FA: "Better than suspended sentences, abolition of the army!" A big bourgeois in tasseled loafers and a name with a particle dared to file a complaint against the CSOC of Bordeaux for its envelopes on the back of which were printed extracts from the Statute - which is of course forbidden - preceded by the note: "Military service is not compulsory". Claude Douffet, from Lille, who was refused the statute for his political motivations, was arrested (18.09.1973) and imprisoned incommunicado in the Metz remand center. The colonel in charge of investigating his case had only one fear: "that publicity would be made about the affair". Won!

During the Brive Carnival, a group of irresponsible and subversive young godelureaux tried to integrate themselves into the Cavalcade with three vehicles decorated with banners, posters, and balloons bearing anti-militarist slogans. Trial, then sentenced to a fine of three hundred francs for "inciting others to evade their military obligations" by propaganda in favor of the law of December 21, 1963. For my part, I wrote to the CJ that "I surrender my Status as one surrenders one's apron and I totally refuse to do military service." I like things to be clear.

Franck Thiriot

(publication of the 2nd part in the November ML and soon the rest on your screen...)

https://monde-libertaire.fr/?articlen=8055
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center