A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_ _The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours | of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) Italy, UCADI #189 - The Melonization of the Zelensky Government (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Tue, 15 Oct 2024 08:08:37 +0300


The petulant almoner Zelensky, like his colleague Meloni, is increasingly under stress, afflicted by the syndrome of suspicions, betrayals, conspiracies, and he indulges in purges, so much so that his staff is increasingly composed under the banner of buddy-buddyism. After all, the Government of Ukraine is not new to dismissals, as the corruption of its ruling class is notoriously chronic, fattening itself on the crest it makes on aid from the West, on the sale of part of the weapons to the black market and the mafia, on the capital gains made on the trade of grain and foodstuffs, on the sale of exemptions from compulsory military service, on the trade of confiscated ecclesiastical property, on the profits made by speculating on the buying and selling of the assets of the population that has left the country and that sells off the property to build a new life elsewhere; all causes that, as reported by the Ukrainian newspapers themselves, have constituted the reason for the dismissals and changes.
If it is true that the strategic expedient of Kursk was momentarily worthwhile, to raise the morale of a part of public opinion, it is also true that the uncertain outcome of the operation that led to the weakening of the front in Donbass leaves many doubts open on the actual usefulness of the operation that was possible thanks to a change of pace in the strategy of the Ukrainian army and of NATO itself. At least some Western military strategists have taken note that in terms of the number of conscripts, training and availability of ammunition and volume of fire, the Ukrainian army is becoming increasingly incapable of withstanding the growing pressure of the Russian army in a trench and positional war, such as that which is taking place in Donbass, accompanied by continuous bombings and the systematic destruction of the country's energy system and water infrastructure.
For these reasons, even using "volunteers" (read mercenaries), coming from the most diverse countries, generously paid with Western funding, Ukraine has put together about 30,000 men to be used for a war of movement - once it would have been called guerrilla warfare - in a hit-and-run operation, which is carried out by military forces of variable size, depending on the need, who carry out incursions across the border, into Russian territory, and this also with the declared aim of forcing the Russians to divert at least part of the troops deployed in the Donbass and to weaken their offensive capabilities. It is worth noting that the choice of location of the attack takes place in an area very well known and studied in the military academies of Eastern Europe, because it was precisely in those territories that the great battles of the USSR army against the Nazi troops took place, and this allowed the Ukrainians to operate with full knowledge of the characteristics of the terrain, thus facilitating the movement of the troops and logistics. Also in light of the characteristics assumed by the military operation, the Russians are facing the attack as a police operation, an anti-terrorism action, bringing in troops from other areas of the country, rather than diverting forces from Donbass.
For this set of reasons, as we write, the final results of the operation are uncertain and will probably develop with the presence of a continuous guerrilla action, which will expand with other Ukrainian incursions across the border, with widespread, short and fast actions, to keep the front active. The tactical expedient could work even if it lacks specific strategic objectives, unless the Russians manage to interrupt the flow of supplies to the Ukrainian expeditionary force, especially in relation to the main lines of action, and gather sufficient forces to open another front in the direction of Sunny, a city very close to the border and certainly more vulnerable than Kharkov.
This is why, in light of all these unknowns, Ukraine is once again insistently asking for authorization to use the missile system provided by NATO for offensive actions in Russian territory, in depth, up to hitting the bases from which air and missile attacks are launched, and this cannot but seriously jeopardize the modalities of an inevitable Russian response to this initiative.
The crisis that has developed in the Ukrainian government and the intensification of Russian destructive infrastructural actions tell us that also in view of the outcome of the elections in the United States, people are starting to think that we need to act quickly to create the conditions to continue to manage power in the future, even after the war is over or frozen: for this reason, we need to complete the liquidation of the canonical Orthodox Church, taking away as many assets and resources as possible, we need to take possession of as many assets as possible, taking advantage of the state of war and before the return of the refugees, we need to lay the foundations to grant control of the central and essential assets of political power to a well-tested and homogeneous group of power that, strong in its commitment to the war, is characterized by a fierce nationalism and is able to guarantee for the future a government direction consistent with that which characterized the conduct of war operations. We must not forget that it will be this ruling class that will manage the business of reconstruction which, given the catastrophic extent of the damage, will be enormous, and all at the expense of the European Union; it must be taken into account that in the new climate of peace or at least of truce, the economic assets of the country will be rebuilt, while the distribution of landed properties and building land in the cities and villages, destroyed and to be rebuilt, will undergo a definitive adjustment. It will still be up to the ruling class, emerging from the war, to manage relations with the Union, moving within the community budget to profit for Ukraine from the majority of the common resources that the Union has, because it is from these sources that the future wealth of the Ukrainian oligarchs will derive, who will divide the spoils of war, feasting on the dead.

G. C.

https://www.ucadi.org/2024/09/28/la-melonizzazione-del-governo-zelensky/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center