A - I n f o s

a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts Our archives of old posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Greek_ 中文 Chinese_ Castellano_ Catalan_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_ _The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours | of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008 | of 2009 | of 2010 | of 2011 | of 2012 | of 2013 | of 2014 | of 2015 | of 2016 | of 2017 | of 2018 | of 2019 | of 2020 | of 2021 | of 2022 | of 2023 | of 2024

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups

(en) Italy, UCADI @188 - In the Referendum on differentiated autonomy (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]

Date Wed, 18 Sep 2024 10:19:30 +0300


After the publication of Law 26 June 2024, no. 86, which introduces the differentiated autonomy of the Regions, on the one hand, initiatives aimed at repealing this law have taken shape, on the other hand, the Regions in favor of introducing the measure (Veneto Lombardy, Piedmont, Friuli Venezia Giulia, Liguria), have rushed to present requests to open negotiations to stipulate the necessary conventions preparatory to the transfer of competences or at least those that do not require funding, since the law in fact lacks the necessary coverage to implement it.
The opposition, against the law, have implemented the necessary initiatives to prevent its application by acting on two fronts: On the one hand, the Regional Councils of Sardinia, Puglia, Tuscany and Campania have appealed to the Constitutional Court, challenging the legitimacy of the law which, in their opinion, exceeds the powers of the government and calls into question those of the Regions excluded from active participation in the procedure. Emilia Romagna is not among the Regions that have turned to the Consulta, which is paying for the ambiguities of its President and its council, which before the approval of the law had maintained an ambiguous behavior, joining in with their own request for the transfer of competences to the Regions managed by the right. Its President elected to the European Parliament and resigned sees the regional council in charge for current affairs and therefore deprived of the capacity to deliberate in this sense.
Despite these contradictions, parties and social and political movements have started a collection of signatures to call a popular referendum with an extremely clear question: "Do you want the law of 26 June 2024, n. 86, "Provisions for the implementation of the differentiated autonomy of the Regions with ordinary statute pursuant to Article 116, third paragraph, of the Constitution" to be repealed?
Heeding the appeal of the proponents of the referendum, who filed the question before the Constitutional Court, more than 500,000 citizens have already signed, in the space of just three weeks. the question taking advantage of the fact that the online subscription procedure for the question has finally been activated, as required by law. To this number must be added the signatures collected at the stands organized in many squares and events even if these signatures will have to be authenticated and certified unlike the online ones that already are.
The political effects of what is happening have quickly been felt, even in the majority parties and especially in Forza Italia, which has seen the Calabrian governor Occhiuto express well-founded doubts about the measure. Opening the way to his party's strategy of distancing itself, at least partially, from the government's action. while not breaking the solidarity of the majority, the Calabrian governor in place of the stakes to the implementation procedures.
The effects of this stance have intersected with the debate that has developed on the ius scholae that has practically monopolized the political chatter of the summer, together with the gossip about the alleged investigations that the sister of the prime minister is supposedly the subject of, seasoned with self-produced news about the family affairs of the traditionally irregular Meloni clan, all seasoned with a more than generous dose of victim mentality. If this gossip activity put together by the Fratelli d'Italia entourage seems to be aimed at staying on the media scene anyway, implementing a mass distraction operation so as not to address the serious and real problems of the country, such as the prison crisis, the dark clouds gathering over the Italian economy in view of the autumn budget, the shovelfuls of dung received in the face following the negotiations at the community level regarding the composition of the new Commission and the designation of the Italian Commissioner, the strategy designed by Forza Italia appears more consistent in its reasons and founded in its objectives.
The party that was Berlusconi's. strong of the good electoral result in the European elections, having sensed the profound meaning and political weight of the implementation of differentiated autonomy in a large part of the country, he glimpses in a very probable disastrous outcome of the referendum the causes of a possible crisis of the government and of the very alliance that supports it and therefore tries to distance himself in advance, albeit timidly and with a prudent tactic, while aiming to gather the consensus of the moderate electorate, which has revealed itself insensitive to the sirens of Renzi and Calenda.

A summer and drawing room debate can well carry out the task of starting to introduce the seed of a differentiation and a distancing from the other two parties of the majority, increasingly busy competing for the most right-wing position, the most identity-based. of the purest and toughest, to play the part of the custodians of an electoral mandate that continues to consider, despite a thousand contradictions, the migrant problem as a priority, which indeed it is, but not from the point of view from which the government addresses it, that is, that of the fight against illegal emigration, made inevitable by a law on emigration and a completely inadequate immigration policy, but from that of keeping the accounts in order to keep the pension system afloat and, why not, the health system. Even the new president of the INPS, wanted by the right-wing government, was forced to admit, together with Giorgetti himself. Minister of the Treasury, that the pension system can only support itself if the number of active workers increases and this can only come from emigration that must be organized and qualified, made legal so that immigrant workers become contributors; a different solution based on the birth rate and demographic growth, does not offer credible solutions especially in the short term. Furthermore, the conditions of super-exploitation of migrants have highlighted the unmanageability of the clandestine labor market that the Government fuels with its immigration policy.

Differentiated autonomy new financial and stability pact

The new financial that is being prepared will not reserve even a cent for the financing of the LEP (minimum levels of benefits) of which, moreover, not even the parameters that allow their quantification and identification have been defined. And yet the measure on differentiated autonomy is extremely dangerous and is much more than a flag planted by the League that certifies the achievement of a goal it has long desired but achieved out of time, when the economic and structural reasons that could have made it convenient, at least for the regions that request its implementation, have completely disappeared, together with the economic collapse of the German economy. The Bavarian area and Rhine capitalism are no longer the locomotive of Europe and no longer constitute the saving anchor for the economies of the regions of northern Italy. In this situation what remains is an autarchic project for the management of resources that will create increasing difficulties for the regions that adopt it and that will not be able to create a system with the others and at the same time effectively insert themselves into the context of the European and world economy. Such a prospect is asphyxiating for the Regions even if they were to claim for themselves the management, as is foreseen, of export and foreign trade policy, representing economic and productive entities that are decidedly inadequate with respect to the markets on which they must compete.
In light of these considerations, differentiated autonomy becomes a damage and a mockery for the same forces that promoted it. In the world in which we currently live, the timing of implementation of the measures is essential: this means that it is not certain that what was good or could have allowed advantages and benefits in the 80s of the last century is functional and appropriate today and above all that it is adequate for the new economic scenarios that have emerged. It follows that the differentiated autonomy project is today old, reckless and full of negative consequences, not only for the Regions that request it, but also for those that suffer from it and for the entire country system.
The stability pact signed by the government at the European level provides for a draconian policy of deficit containment and therefore a containment of public spending, with painful cuts to expenses aimed at satisfying social needs, since the budget is burdened by military spending, which will need to be increased until reaching 2% of GDP, by funding that bottomless pit that is constituted by the feeding of Ukrainian nationalism, which with ever greater rapacity and petulance, asks for resources, passing itself off as a dispenser of security for the peoples of Europe, when instead it manages and prepares their economic and social decline.

An action to restore public finances and abandon the policy of constantly increasing debt, in other words, a reversal of the trend, would require not only a rationalization of the expenses of the bureaucratic apparatus of the State through a profound reform of procedures, but also and above all the cutting of unproductive expenses, and among these especially those aimed at war which constitute a waste of precious and irreplaceable resources. A tax reform characterized by the introduction of an effective progressivity in the taxation of income could constitute the starting point for a serious policy to relaunch the economic and social development of the country.
While waiting to know what the government's orientations will be regarding the finalization of the new financial law, the verification of the signatures collected in the referendum on September 14, that is when the deadline for collecting signatures expires, will constitute a litmus test that will allow us to verify how much the country still relies on this government majority. The subsequent political campaign that will precede the referendum vote will also allow the opposition and the social formations that have signed the referendum question to test the strength of their alliance and to develop a program of future action that will see them opposed in content to this government majority.

The Editorial Staff

https://www.ucadi.org/2024/09/01/al-referendum-sullautonomia-differenziata/
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center