|
A - I n f o s
|
|
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
Our
archives of old posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Greek_
中文 Chinese_
Castellano_
Catalan_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
_The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Türkçe_
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours |
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008 |
of 2009 |
of 2010 |
of 2011 |
of 2012 |
of 2013 |
of 2014 |
of 2015 |
of 2016 |
of 2017 |
of 2018 |
of 2019 |
of 2020 |
of 2021 |
of 2022 |
of 2023
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF - How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
(en) France, CNT-AIT, Anarchosyndicalisme #183 - Green capitalism, and so-called "greenwashing" (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
Date
Wed, 25 Oct 2023 09:22:54 +0300
Ecology, in recent years, has taken on significant importance in the
political scene. Not a week, not a day, without a politician taking an
ecological or pseudo-ecological position, from the NPA to the RN via
Macron, everyone claims it. It has become a commonplace where it is
difficult to bring contradiction, under penalty of anathema uttered by
the last of the climate-skeptic bastards. Ecology has a good back in
being able to give itself a respectable image as a politician,
especially when there is an electoral issue, and like these people who
claim to govern us from the highest level of the state to the lowest.
municipality, belong to a social class that is the bourgeoisie, we
sometimes witness grotesque situations in big cities and in the countryside.
Thus, in the city of Toulouse, we are witnessing in the name of the
fight against global warming a species of gentrification which does not
speak its name. In fact, the municipality of this city set up a ZFE (low
emission zone) on January 1 of this year, which consists of prohibiting
the most polluting vehicles marked Crit'Air 4 and 5 and not classified
from circulating in the city. . What appears to be a progressive and
eco-friendly measure is in reality a discriminatory measure, since most
Toulouse residents and people who live in neighboring towns, who do not
have the means to afford a clean and clean car until end, because this
implies that they will have to buy a new car every two or three years
under penalty of a fine, will no longer be able to go to town, or even
will no longer be able to return home. So it is a safe bet that between
now and 2024 there will be many moves by proletarians who earn a meager
living, for the benefit of new arrivals who will have money and brand
new electric cars. Long life to Eco-friendly Nuclear!!! On the one hand,
they are relaunching the automobile economy and on the other, driving
out the working-class population of Toulouse, being out of the game from
the start! And this is how we transform Toulouse into a city of the
rich. Well done Moudenc and what's more, you are entitled to the super
eco-friendly medal.
A few kilometers away, the Castres-Toulouse highway project, which,
originally, was a whim of the pharmaceutical industrialist Pierre Fabre
(and friend of Antoine Seilliere), argued by what would like to be a
strong argument, namely opening up the South Tarn, a rather questionable
situation since there is already a good national road which should
simply be redeveloped. But when we question the merits of building this
unnecessary highway, we are treated to a host of insults, often coming
from people who are not residents of the region, who have no idea of the
context other than to simple fantasies. Castres-Toulouse is only 67 km,
it's not the end of the world. But the populations of the south of the
Tarn department who are not, and far from it, wealthy people, will avoid
taking this future highway which, further east, will pay around EUR8,
others say EUR15 - whatever 'in any case, it's an injustice: there
already exists a Toulouse-Albi motorway which is completely free!!!
And there, we saw contingents of ecologists arrive from the four corners
of French territory, to explain that there will be damage, that it is
not good... But to make a simple departmental road, there also harms the
ecosystem, and what is annoying is that these ecologists come to give
lessons, of course it is true, a rather useless project. But why didn't
they come before?
Because this region has long been polluted, even very polluted, and the
great forests of the Black Mountains prove nothing. For decades, since
the beginning of the industrial revolution, or even before, there has
always been pollution, particularly arsenic in the former silver mines
in Salsignes, a few kilometers from Castres, north of Carcassonne.: the
working-class towns of Mazamet and Graulhet had a few decades ago the
French record for the most polluted rivers in the country with various
particularly toxic chemicals, the inhabitants of these towns had plenty
of time to smell the bad odors and admiring the fanciful colors that
their rivers sometimes took on. At those times, where were the super
ecologists?? Nowadays the south of the Tarn department is a region with
high unemployment where people leave to find work elsewhere, and the old
people stay.
Capitalism has always come to terms with ecology, has even created a
market and a way of life, aimed at the "middle" classes, the lower
bourgeoisie of big cities, a population that is rarely found in regions
like the south of Tarn or the department of Aude whose living conditions
certainly do not interest these "ecologists". We will remember the
"rural rednecks" who disdained the yellow vests at the time.
And ecology in recent years has often appealed to emotions, like the far
right.
The two come together on the fear of the unknown and sometimes the
absence of considered judgment.
Political leaders and the exploiters of large industrial groups have
long understood that environmental degradation could be detrimental to
their economy, that expenses to protect or reproduce the workforce are
increasing, and that pollution gives rise to unhealthy reactions. for
business and political stability.
And it is entirely logical that large industrial groups reposition
themselves in favor of ecology, and carry out acts of "militancy" to
save the planet, but this is only a facade posture. With this motorway
story, I can very well see the Pierre Fabre and Airbus labs turning
around and giving us lessons in ecology via the municipalities of
Toulouse and Castres. As Raul Gardini, big boss or ex-big boss of the
Ferruzzi group which owns (or had) the highly polluting Montedison
chemical factory, said: "Ecology is the future of the economy, and
agriculture the tool the most important in ecology"[1].
When big business starts talking about ecology, nothing seems good for
the future of ordinary people. The most important environmental NGOs,
for example the WWF, were created by biologists, but also businessmen,
and this organization has links with companies like Gazprom, Crédit
Agricole or even the agri-food industry, which; it is well known, is
very respectful of the environment.
This shows one thing: all these bourgeois from EELV to Greenpeace, who
give us lessons all year round on ecology, asking us to tighten our
belts, to fly less (it is certain that the prole from the corner or even
the precarious person at the RSA often takes the plane to the factory or
to Pôle Emploi), or constantly talks to us about electric cars, about
climate change having to be largely financed, but then in this case
financed by whom? Gazprom? Lafarge? Shell? Coca cola?... That is to say,
multinationals who ruin our lives, who make us work in dirty conditions,
who pay us poverty wages, fire us like trash, physically poison us, and
damage the environment , who ask governments to delay the retirement
age, and at the same time tell us that we must be careful, because the
end of the world is near and that if you do not sort the waste, you are
a irresponsible. This is a bad joke!
It is obvious that ecology is nowadays a business like any other. Under
the pretext of a catastrophic rise in temperatures, official speeches
are ready to make us swallow anything, such as accepting dangerous
technologies like nuclear power, which would apparently be good for the
climate, and which behind everything that, without taking into account
the divergent or converging economic interests of the different factions
of international capitalism, and the waste of money invested in this
campaign against the climate crisis. In the meantime, people in everyday
life are subjected to the economic interests of one or another in the
name of the fight against global warming, without taking into account
the living conditions of the proletariat who only have the right to to
keep silent and suffer. The proletarians are only entitled to contempt
and infantilization.
http://cntaittoulouse.lautre.net/spip.php?article1365
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe https://ainfos.ca/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
- Prev by Date:
(en) Greece, APO: Kostas Manioudakis murdered by the uniformed assault battalions of the republic | Gatherings in Athens and Thessaloniki (ca, de, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
- Next by Date:
(en) UK, Freedom News: A lot of despair right now: Interview with an Israeli anarchist (ca, de, fr, it, pt, tr)[machine translation]
A-Infos Information Center