A-Infos (en) Myths & Legends: Gandhi (from Organise!)

["Peregrine (David)" <peregrine@cybergal.com>]

 ________________________________________________
      A - I N F O S  N E W S  S E R V I C E
            http://www.ainfos.ca/
 ________________________________________________

Taken from “Organise!”, the magazine of the
Anarchist Communist Federation.
-------------------------------------------------------

Myths and Legends - Gandhi

ORGANISE! IS STARTING a new series, Myths and Legends, which will take a
look at various ‘Sacred Cows’, diagnose BSE and recommend culling. We kick
off with a look at the ‘saint’ of non-violence, Mahatma Gandhi.

Mahatma Gandhi is often cited by pacifists as the shining example of how
non-violent civil disobedience works successfully. Unfortunately, these
paeans of praise leave out a close study of Gandhi’s role in the Indian
struggle for ‘independence’, and just as importantly, who were his class
allies in that struggle.

By 1919 the Indian capitalist class had decided they wanted independence
from the British rulers. However, as can be imagined, the British were
reluctant to agree to this and a propaganda campaign for withdrawal had no
effect. Indian workers and peasants also resented the yoke of British
domination. In response to a mass rally at Amritsar in the Punjab, General
Dyer ordered the machine-gunning of the crowd, resulting in over 300 dead
and many thousands wounded.

The Indian capitalist class came to the conclusion that after the failure
of the propaganda campaign, mass action was necessary to gain independence.
However, they were haunted by the spectre of the Russian revolution, which
had progressed from democratic demands to outright social revolution. They
received the answer to their prayers in Gandhi, who had already led several
campaigns of civil disobedience in South Africa against the racist laws
there. He thus had a certain credibility, and was also not hindered by any
identification with any particular region of the sub-continent.

Trustees

His theories of civil disobedience were rooted in Hindu theology. He
preached the unity of classes among Indians, the rich to be "trustees" to
the poor. This message of class unity was vital if he was to create an
alliance between the industrialists and the rich peasants. Indian
capitalists enthusiastically welcomed these ideas, and he was financed by
some of the leading industrialists in West India, the Sarabhais, textile
magnates in the Gujarat, and the Birlas, second largest industrialist group
in all of India. Millions of rupees were given to him over a period of 25
years. The rich peasants and shopkeepers also provided a pool of activists
for his Congress Party. Gandhi, due to his simplicity of life style, was
able to mobilise peasants and workers behind him in the cause of
nationalism, where the Indian politicians in top hats and morning suits
would have found it very difficult. He facilitated a cross-cross alliance
for nationalism.

Gandhi had advocated his doctrines of non-violence from early on. This did
not stop him from supporting the British in 1899 in the Boer War,
volunteering to help them and organising an ambulance corps. As he said,
"As long as the subjects owe allegiance to a state, it is their clear duty
generally to accommodate themselves, and to accord their support, to the
acts of the state". When Gandhi was organising a mass march in South Africa
in 1913, to obtain rights for Indians there, the white railway workers went
on strike over pay and conditions. Gandhi immediately cancelled his march,
saying that civil resisters should not take advantage of a government’s
difficulty .On the outbreak of the First World War, Gandhi actively
recruited for the British war effort, despite his ‘pacifism’. On the
outbreak of the Second World War, he publicly pledged not to embarrass the
British, and would lend moral support to the Allies.

Obey

Each of Gandhi’s mass campaigns of civil disobedience (1920-1922,
1930-1933,1942) took place when British capitalism was in trouble. Each
crisis broke a few more links with Britain. They also strengthened the
Indian capitalists. Fair enough, one can argue, it was good tactics to
attack British imperialism when it was in difficulties. What Gandhi failed
to do was tie the second campaign to a massive working class upsurge, in
conjunction with a mass campaign against a British Parliamentary Commission
touring India (both in 1928). Instead he waited till 1930 to launch the
campaign. He rejected the idea of teaming workers struggles with a campaign
for British withdrawal because he was an advocate of peace between the
different classes of India.

Gandhi never questioned the concept of "legality" either. He told his
supporters to obey the law and he always insisted that the British had a
"legal right" to arrest them. Once arrested, the campaigners were told to
cut themselves off from everything outside and passively await their
release.

When in April 1946 Indian sailors mutinied in Bombay and Indian soldiers
refused to fire on them, Gandhi’s Congress Party refused to support them,
which effectively broke the mutiny. Workers demonstrated their support in
mass strikes, and the thought of workers and rank-and-file soldiers
combining in action must have been troubling to Gandhi.

Gandhi’s use of the Hindu religion as justification for civil disobedience
was disastrous. Not only did it alienate the members of other religions in
India, principally the Muslims, but it legitimised the caste system. Gandhi
opposed one caste oppressing another, but he never came out in favour of
the abolition of the caste system itself. Many "untouchables" were
alienated in this way. The massacres that took place after independence
were at least partly due to Gandhi’s reluctance to include the Muslims
within his Congress Party.

Although Gandhi admitted that he had read certain libertarian thinkers,
principally Kropotkin, he had very little in common with their ideas. While
Kropotkin was committed to the end of class society, Gandhi never
repudiated either the class or the caste system, and never tried to reach
out to the working class, in India or internationally. For that matter, his
Puritanism, his dislike of sexuality, his cult of martyrdom, have very
little to do with militant anarchism.





	***A-INFOS DISCLAIMER - IMPORTANT PLEASE NOTE***

A-Infos disclaims responsibility for the information in this message.


			********
		The A-Infos News Service
			********
		COMMANDS: majordomo@tao.ca
		REPLIES: a-infos-d@tao.ca
		HELP: a-infos-org@tao.ca
		WWW: http://www.ainfos.ca/
		INFO: http://www.ainfos.ca/org