A-Infos (en) English version Chiapas Al Dia 108

[CIEPAC <ciepac@laneta.apc.org>]

 ________________________________________________
      A - I N F O S  N E W S  S E R V I C E
            http://www.ainfos.ca/
 ________________________________________________

English Version of  "Chiapas Al Dia" No. 108
(previously published as La Opinion)
published by CIEPAC
San Cristobal, Chiapas
6 May 1998


                          The  Future of  "Profound" Mexico 
                               (Reflections on Autonomy) 


With the EZLN (Zapatista National Liberation Army) uprising of Jan. 1,
1994, the indigenous peoples, by raising new and  historic demands, and
breathing new life into the democratic traditions of  indigenous
communities --one of the most important elements that the neoliberal
project would have disappear--  went from being part of profound Mexico to
becoming one of its key players in the country´s democratic transition.
[Fernando Benitez, one of Mexico's leading anthropologists, coined the term
"profound Mexico" to describe its indigenous peoples, those who make up the
substrata, the backbone, the essence and the soul of the Mexicans, in spite
of being forgotten, discriminated against and maligned by the mestizos and
the whites].

At present, given the democratic transition that Mexico needs  and the
limitations which the political parties have in their ability to act within
the governing structures, it is civil society that is opening new spaces
and  discovering new ways to act politically.  The EZLN's demands, and
other long-standing demands (¨command by obeying ¨,  ¨everything for
everyone, for us nothing¨, ¨indigenous autonomy¨, ¨dignity¨, ¨peace¨,
¨justice¨) have gained a great deal of support. Civil society is availing
itself of these concepts.  A new democratic culture is rising in Mexico,
one which fundamentally seeks to include all sectors in the decision-making
process, one which is fulfilling its promise to ¨command by obeying¨, and
one in which daily struggle includes the respect for difference and
minorities. 

This new way of doing politics is included in the agreements on Human
Rights and Indigenous Culture signed between the EZLN and the federal
government on February 16, 1996 in San Andres. Nevertheless, the government
is now failing to keep its word. At the same time, while proclaiming its
commitment to carry out  the  San Andres Accords, the government has drawn
up its own agreement, thus invalidating the original one. While the
government asserts its position, the indigenous groups of Chiapas, also
basing their actions on the San Andres Accords, have begun to exercise
their  autonomy by installing Rebel Municipalities and Autonomous Zones
without seeking  governmental permission. This is a drawn out process,
which slowing but surely disarticulates the already worn out state
political system and its party, as well as the political party system on
which this facade of Mexican democracy  has relied. 

President Zedillo in his State of the Union address on September 1, 1997
did not mention the indigenous topic and the armed conflict in Chiapas. He
tried to ignore the EZLN due to its role as one of the principal players in
Mexico's transition towards democracy.  In light of official attempts to
ignore the indigenous movement, the Zapatistas responded with a peaceful
march in Mexico City in September 1997, which was known as the Parade of
1,111 Zapatistas, and placed  the indigenous people on the front pages of
the national and international press. Once again, the conscience of
Mexico´s people was shaken and the government was warned that if a just
solution to Zapatista demands was not forthcoming, the only way to resist
and govern would be to implement "municipalities in rebellion". The
government response was to make use of paramilitary groups.  The indigenous
groups returned from Mexico City on September 16. On the 17th, the
paramilitary groups savagely attacked the town of Majomut in Chenalho
municipality, where the Zapatistas were informing their supporters about
the march. The result was the death of Zapatistas and two members of a
paramilitary group in Los Chorros. This was followed by aggressive acts
which continued until the massacre in Acteal on  December 22, 1997.  

Autonomy and the Construction of Grassroots Power

We can identify two options in the struggle for autonomy: one which
originates in the community,  spreads to the Rebel Municipalities in
coordination with  regional efforts, and  in doing so, disregards the
official ¨Constitutional¨ municipal authorities.  The other option consists
of groups of organized individuals who seek to establish themselves as
Regional Pluriethnic Autonomies (RAP).          

The first option came to light on December 19, 1994, when the EZLN ¨broke¨
through the military encirclement of the Lacandon Forest set up by the
federal government.  This military operation showed  the government that
the EZLN was not just an ¨armed group¨ present in only 4 municipalities,
but rather a force to be reckoned with in some 30 municipalities, all of
which declared themselves in rebellion. These acts demonstrated that the
indigenous in rebellion would not recognize the municipal authorities
imposed by the government through fraudulent elections and the
¨appointment¨ (dedazo) of candidates. It named its new representatives by
taking into account the wishes of the communities and delivered the mantel
of authority to the new authorities.  All of this meant a new way of living
and of relating to the different indigenous communities. 

The indigenous people spoke loudly and clearly during the inauguration of
the ¨Ernesto Che Guevara¨ Rebel Municipality, located in the Rebel Region
of ¨Tzotz Choj¨ in the municipality of Ocosingo: ¨We are and want to be a
part of Mexico and not strangers in the land in which we were born. We are
and want to be part of the great Mayan nation which many moons and suns ago
flourished in these valleys.  We are and want to be part of the development
of the nation that we love, where there can be democracy, liberty and
justice. We only want to be equal to all, not more nor less. We want to
have the same rights for our government leaders  and for the governed
without regard to language, custom, or religion. We want to be respected as
indigenous people.¨ (from the Zapatista proclamation made in the ¨Ernesto
Che Guevara¨ municipality, on Sept. 27, 1997.)  At this event, an
indigenous religious leader, named by the people themselves, officiated at
a celebration to install the new Indigenous Parliament.

This marked the beginning of another stage in the  indigenous community
struggle, now under the jurisdiction of these new municipalities. In other
words, community autonomy has begun to be exercised along with a refusal to
receive governmental help while peace, justice and dignity do not exist,
and while the San Andres Accords are not carried out. Property taxes will
not be paid, electrical energy fees will not be paid (in those few places
where this service exists), official institutions will not be permitted to
enter.  Everything will be done to resist all that can divide, co-opt,
corrupt, etc.  The indigenous people also have named their own authorities
and commissions: Education, Health, Honor and Justice, Human Rights, Women,
Ecotourism, Language, etc., with representatives chosen from the local
indigenous communities which have worked out their own laws in their own
language. It is rightly the beginning of an alternative, which while facing
a series of challenges and obstacles, has challenged the local political
bosses by constructing a power base from below. Their motto is ¨power is
not taken, it is constructed.¨

Furthermore, the indigenous groups have begun to control territory, where
the strategy is the establishment of new criteria for the exploitation of
natural resources, the appointment of authorities, and respect for
indigenous customs and ways of life.  (The government's biggest fear is
exactly this new type of relationship being demanded by the indigenous
people).  For this reason,  political parties and traditional political
leaders are no longer the determining factors in this situation. And the
has created  a crisis.  Many of the municipal leaders chosen by the PRI
have been left governing only in the principal municipalities and, in some
cases, trying to govern from rented houses, because the Zapatistas have
taken  control of the municipal president´s offices, as in the
municipalities of El Bosque and San Andres.  On April 10, 1998,   the
municipality of ¨Ricardo Flores Magon¨ declared itself to be a Rebel
Municipality,  in the community of Taniperlas, in the constitutional
municipality of Ocosingo.  The community was overrun by the military and
vacated on April 11, and several persons were arrested, 7 from the
community and 2 from national solidarity groups.  Twelve members from
international solidarity groups were expelled from the country.  (Expulsion
carries with it a lifelong ban on legally entering Mexico again).

On May 1 the municipality known as Earth and Freedom (Tierra y Libertad),
headquartered in Amparo Agua Tinta, in the Constitutional Municipality of
Las Margaritas, was vacated in a joint police-military takeover. The result
was 61 peasant arrested (53 Mexicans and 8 Guatemalan refugees), three with
gunshot wounds with several who were beaten up, and the destruction and
theft of personal possessions. All of this took place under the watchful
eye of PRI members.

On May 4, Governor Albores arrived in Amparo Agua Tinta with gifts and
other handouts to reinstall the PRI authorities in the community.
Meanwhile, the public security police installed itself in the ex-offices of
the Autonomous Municipality. President Zedillo´s visits to Chiapas have
been interpreted by different groups in Chiapas as a  way of provoking the
Zapatistas and show unwavering support for the State Government. Zedillo
signed the State Reconciliation Agreement, ¨as an honorable witness¨, part
of the arsenal used to justify the offensive against the Autonomous
Municipalities.  

Of the 111 constitutional municipalities in Chiapas, the EZLN is  present
in 40, in which 38 Autonomous Municipalities have been formed.  Judging
from the latest incidents of violence, it will come as no surprise that,
along with Army´s harassment of Simojovel,  the next municipalities to be
destroyed soon will be Juan de la Libertad, Consejo Antonomo de Polho, San
Andres Sacam Chen de los Pobres and Ernesto Che Guevara.

We can conclude that Governor Albores is the ¨puppet¨ of a federal
strategy, since it is he who claims to have ordered the incursions by the
police and army into the autonomous municipalities. If the strategy fails,
he would be the easiest to  sacrifice, thus salvaging the policies
implemented by the Interior Secretary.  

In order to guarantee its policies, the State Government has announced the
hiring of 4,500 police and the creation of an anti-riot unit made up of 500
women in order to confront the Zapatista women who have held back the
federal Army from entering the communities, literally with their bare
hands.  This is why the government-sponsored TV Channel 10 in Chiapas has
sought the hiring of women between the ages of 17 and 25 to become part of
this anti-riot unit. These special units will be trained  by the
Presidential Chief of Staff  and the Army in counterinsurgency tactics, the
securing of buildings, the blocking of highways, the securing of offices,
etc. (Diario Expreso, March 13, 1998)

The strategy is to convince PRI members and the communities that they
should request the vacating and destruction of the Autonomous
Municipalities. Afterwards, the public security police, the National
Attorney General (PGR), and Immigration can step in. 

If, by chance, there were to be an armed response from the Zapatistas, the
Army would enter into action, thus violating the Law of Dialogue for
Conciliation and a Dignified Peace in Chiapas.  Consequently at least  6
objectives would be achieved: 
(1) the destruction of the Rebel Municipality and the forceful installation
of the PRI;
(2) the installation of yet more military and police encampments which,
under the guise of legality, will be able to expand their control over the
Zapatista area;  (3) the taking of Zapatistas as prisoners under fabricated
criminal charges and, thus, creating political hostages for possible
negotiations; (4) the deporting of foreigners and the elimination of
international witnesses from the region; (5) the dispersal of the
population in order to disarticulate the EZLN's support base (by laying
siege to the area in order to create hunger, a feeling of harassment and
fatigue, particularly in women and children, in order to hold them as
hostages; the same can be said for the adults who flee to the mountains);
(6) the attempt to corrupt and bribe Zapatista leaders. These are the
objectives which authorities are trying to carry out prior to the October 4
 municipal and state elections in Chiapas.

Even though the initiative sent by Zedillo to the Congress on Indigenous
Rights and Culture has received the support of the PAN, PRI, and PVEM, it
will continue to be opposed in Zapatista territory. While the State
governor has stated that the future of Chiapas is in jeopardy, what is
really in danger is the PRI's continued presence in power,  and Zedillo´s
neoliberal (structural adjustment) policies.  

The second option in  the struggle for autonomy arises from the efforts of
the Pluriethnic Autonomous Regions (RAP), which depend on the efforts of
individuals to coordinate the municipal and regional organizations,
including the various indigenous towns that make up the established
Pluriethnic Autonomous Regions.  Outpouring of support for the RAPs began
in 1994 within the CEOIC (Council of Indigenous and Campesino
Organizations) which was made up of both indigenous and non-indigenous
organizations.  However, each one of the sectors worked differently.  It
was decided that the indigenous organizations should coordinate their
efforts, thus forming the Plural Indigenous National Assembly for Autonomy,
which is part of the National Indigenous Congress, and which assists in
articulating national goals along with the RAPs. This initiative  began on
October 12, 1995 with a peaceful demonstration at the Cathedral Plaza in
San Cristobal.

This option (RAPs) decided to associate itself with the PRD.  As a result,
the combined indigenous campesino force in the Autonomous Region of the
North has succeeded in winning the official municipal presidencies of
Ixtapa, Bochil, Jitotol, and Huitiupan,  under the PRD banner.  As opposed
to the first option, the RAPs solicit government funding to carry out
production projects. It includes traditional political leaders from the
different political parties. It does not repudiate the municipal presidents
installed by the government. Nor has it created  autonomous municipalities.
 Everything is centralized through the RAP. Direction is provided by a
General Council of Pluriethnic Autonomous Regions with headquarters in San
Cristobal.  For this reason,  the RAPs have not been repressed like the
Autonomous Municipalities. But they have been obliged to hand over the
lands taken in 1994-1995 and to pay the electric and property taxes since
1994. 

The two forms of struggle are valid and respectable. Both are designed to
disarticulate the   regime of government imposed on the Mexican people. But
the challenges and difficulties are great because the State has opted to
respond to both initiatives with a ¨dirty  war¨, a Low Intensity War which
cuts across all economic, political, and social  levels  and all state
organizations in Chiapas. The autonomies are taking control of the land
within its control, but given the  incapacity of the State to find
solutions to the demands of the indigenous people, due to its own internal
crises, the government's response has been to paramilitarizing the
political system. Thus the PRI is temporarily able to regain its power
through pressure tactics and violence. 

The Challenges and Difficulties in the Struggle for Autonomy

The dirty war, presumably  authorized at the highest levels of the
government, has divided the communities. Where before the "community" was
the basis of decision making, now it is the "organization". The challenge
for the autonomies is to get organizations to agree to implement "plans of
resistance" to confront a common enemy. The different organizations,
independent of any political affiliation,  live together in the same
territory where they share highways, water supplies, sports installations,
infrastructure, land conflicts, leaders and government. Yet, they have
disputes over control. These disputes  carry risks of constant
confrontations. Nevertheless, in areas where positions are more unified and
where there are agreements, including with some PRI members, the autonomies
function.

On the other hand, some social organizations that do not belong to the EZLN
and which share the same territory, also attempt to exercise control using
their own rationale.  As a consequence, conflicts arise between ways of
doing at things. The exercise of power  between  authorities, civilians,
military and traditional politicians also comes into play.  

The challenge comes in facing the Low Intensity Warfare orchestrated by the
government, which attempts to disarticulate all of the organized sectors.
This war has as its principal objective ¨the winning of the minds and
hearts of individuals¨ within a particular area. It is a war which is
ripping apart internal social, organizational and even family structures.

The EZLN military force is faced with a federal military encirclement in
the shape of a half moon  ringing the periphery between Palenque in the
North, los Altos, with greater concentration in Chenalho, and from the
Guatemalan border to Ciudad Cuauhtemoc. There is another smaller military
encirclement which tries to neutralize and cover the General Command area
of the EZLN between Guadalupe Tepeyac and the Euseba River.  At the same
time, it tries to undermine and exterminate the indigenous resistance and
the EZLN base support structures, through the use of paramilitary groups
such as Peace and Justice (Paz y Justicia), the Chinchulines, the
Antizapatista Revolutionary Indigenous Movement (MIRA),  the Pun~ales, the
San Bartolome de los Llanos Alliance, etc., along with armed PRI members
(still unnamed) in some 7 municipalities, but whose activities are well
known. Finally, there is coordination among PRI members, Public Security,
the PGR, Immigration and the Army.  

Adding to all of this the federal Army has introduced alcoholism,
prostitution, drug addiction, the destruction of crops, etc., which breaks
up social cohesion and polarizes intra- and inter-community relationships.  

¨The Untenable Trivialization of the Law: Impunity¨
(extract, Part I)

The crimes condemned by the civilized world and International Law:

      ¨today we know that  state, federal, civilian, and military
authorities do not have clean hands in the Acteal affair. ...In accordance
with the ¨Convention to Prevent and Condemn the Crime of Genocide¨ adopted
by the U.N. on December 9, 1948 and which entered into effect on January
12, 1951, genocide is defined by the following acts which have the
objective of destroying in totality or in part a national ethnic, racial or
religious group:
(1) the killing of members of any such group; (2) the infliction of serious
physical or psychological harm to group members; (3) the imposition of
living conditions calculated to bring about its partial or total
destruction; (4) the imposition of  birth control methods within  these
groups; (5) the forcible transporting of  minors from one group to another.¨  

Mexico ratified this provision on July 22, 1952, in which genocide is
referred to as a ¨crime condemned by the civilized world and International
Law¨, which ought to be severely punished not only in the commission of any
act but also in the conspiracy to do so.  Any  public incitement to carry
out such acts or any other type of involvement to execute such action
should also be subject to punishment, whether it be committed in times of
war or peace.¨(Concha, M., La Jornada, Dec. 27, 1997, pg.5.)  This crime
has been incorporated in the Federal Penal Code in article 149.  While the
international law to Prevent and Condemn the Crime of Genocide has been
incorporated into the Mexican penal code, it has been repeatedly violated.
Yet the Mexican government has signed and ratified other international
conventions which have also been trampled, such as:
(1) The International Pact on civil and political rights.
(2) The International Pact on economic, social and cultural rights
(3) The International Convention on the rights of minors.
(4) The International Convention on the elimination of any type of
discrimination against women.

*Extract from a document called ¨The Untenable Trivialization of Law:
Impunity; Three Months after Acteal¨, from ¨The Task Force on Alternative
Popular Communication¨, April 11, 1998.  (Published only in Spanish).

By Gustavo Castro and Onesimo Hidalgo.
Translated by Thomas D. Morin for Nuevo Amanecer Press and CIEPAC.

Published by the
Centro de Investigaciones Economicas y Politicas de Accion Comunitaria
San Cristobal, Chiapas

e-mail: ciepac@laneta.apc.org

Note: This issue of "Chiapas Al Dia" originally appeared in Spanish.
Please send us a message if you wish to be placed on the mailing list for
the version in Spanish, or for both the Spanish and English versions.   In
addition to an "e-mail format", both versions can be sent as "attached
documents", formatted as Word for Windows 7, which you may ask to receive,
indicating if you want one language, or the other, or both.

Please note that not all issues of "Chiapas Al Dia" are translated into
English.


	***A-INFOS DISCLAIMER - IMPORTANT PLEASE NOTE***

A-Infos disclaims responsibility for the information in this message.


			********
		The A-Infos News Service
			********
		COMMANDS: majordomo@tao.ca
		REPLIES: a-infos-d@tao.ca
		HELP: a-infos-org@tao.ca
		WWW: http://www.ainfos.ca/
		INFO: http://www.ainfos.ca/org