A - I n f o s
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists **

News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage) Last two weeks' posts

The last 100 posts, according to language
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Trk�_ The.Supplement

The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_ Deutsch_ Nederlands_ English_ Français_ Italiano_ Polski_ Português_ Russkyi_ Suomi_ Svenska_ Trk�
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours || of past 30 days | of 2002 | of 2003 | of 2004 | of 2005 | of 2006 | of 2007 | of 2008

Syndication Of A-Infos - including RDF | How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
{Info on A-Infos}

(en) Britain, Aanarchist journal Direct Action #41- Organising - Comments:

Date Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:34:20 +0200



Comment: Death by Superbugs: The scandalous legacy of NHS funding cuts,
performance targets and privatisation ---- If one thing reflects the sorry state
of the NHS today more than anything else, it is the superbug epidemic. According
to recent figures, hospital superbugs like MRSA and C-Difficile are now
responsible for 5,000 deaths per year, with up to 100,000 other patients being
infected. ---- Following the Commission for Healthcare Inspection’s revelations
of 90 deaths due to C-Difficile between 2004-6 in Tonbridge and Kent NHS Trust,
there was a public inquest. One key causal factor identified was the Trust’s
preoccupation with performance targets, which in turn led to practices like
patients being told to relieve themselves in their beds rather than in ward
toilet facilities.

Generally poor standards of cleanliness were observed, as was high bed turnover.
One former Consultant reflected that privatisation of cleaning services and
repeated management restructures also contributed.

Putting the NHS at the mercy of the market (by both Labour and the Tories) was
always going to have this impact. Labour-intensive services such as hospital
cleaning can only be made profitable by cutting wages and jobs. Since 1984,
Unison figures reveal a fall in the number of cleaners from 100,000 to just
55,000 today. Privatisation has also meant these crucial services have become
organisationally detached from the NHS.

The obsession with meeting targets, another outcome of Government policy,
focuses services on providing an appearance of efficiency. Unfortunately,
reduced waiting times and increased patient throughput are realised largely at
the expense of quality of care. As a consequence, ailments go untreated or
undiagnosed, leading to further human and financial costs further down the line.
So much for ‘efficiency’. Taxpayers and patients alike are getting a raw deal to
say the very least.

In the wake of the deaths in Tonbridge and Kent, the Commission for Healthcare
Inspection reported:

Many staff told us that senior managers were still reluctant to implement
major infection control measures such as closing wards or using buffer beds to
separate infected patients from others on the ward. They said this was because
of the shortage of beds and the need to meet targets.

The report continued:

The vast majority of nurses and other clinical staff interviewed considered
that poor care was in large part due to having inadequate staffing levels.

Health services should be universal, comprehensive and free at the point of
delivery. They should be organised, delivered and controlled directly by workers
and responsive to patients. The superbug epidemic is symptomatic of
privatisation and service cuts started by the Tories, and continued
enthusiastically by New Labour. Whilst services remain at the mercy of meddling
politicians, bureaucrats and market forces, problems such as superbugs will remain.
------------------------------------------------

Comment:

The ‘Caring’ Face of New Labour - part 2: How modern social policy exploits
unpaid carers and the elderly

Anyone who has had to give up work to care for a chronically ill or disabled
friend or relative will know that the support you get from the state is, to put
it mildly, shameful. As well as the emotional and physical demands, severe
financial penalties compound an already difficult and often stressful set of
circumstances. And, with the increasingly ageing UK population, estimates
suggest that those of us engaged in unpaid care could rise to 10 million in the
next 30 years.

A survey of 300 carers undertaken by Carers UK last year showed that the current
benefits system fails to allow carers an acceptable standard of living, neither
recognising nor valuing their contribution – see box below for further details.

Yet the support provided by unpaid carers is estimated to save the state £87
billion per year. But enabling practical support to carers, it seems, is far
less fashionable to Brown and Co. than courting multi-millionaire tax dodgers,
fighting imperialist wars and replenishing the costly Trident program.

Unpaid carers aren’t the only ones to suffer due to New Labour’s market driven
social policy. The way our society treats the elderly, particularly those
requiring nursing home care, is also nothing short of scandalous.

It is well documented how those requiring residential nursing/care are often
forced to sell their homes to pay for it. With ‘Continuing Care’ legislation
healthcare should be free, yet thousands in England and Wales are still charged,
as a 2006 Panorama programme, ‘The National Homes Swindle’, confirmed. The
relative of one woman with Parkinson’s and Dementia who was forced to sell her
home, summed up the frustration of many: “It’s outrageous theft and it’s going
on in this country hundreds and hundreds of times”.
Although New Labour criticised the Tories for forcing 40,000 pensioners to sell
their homes, and Blair said he didn’t want “a country where the only way
pensioners can get long term care is by selling their home”, nothing has
changed. This led one lawyer to comment: “It’s dishonest and it’s quite
astonishing that it’s gone on for so long unaddressed”.

2-tier nursing homes

To make matters worse, a 2-tier model of nursing home care has emerged. Despite
massive fees, the standard of care in most care homes is, to say the very least,
basic. You might get fed and toileted, a token entertainer or a bit of
physiotherapy now and again, but by and large you’re just left to vegetate in
front of the TV. In some you even have to share a room with someone you’ve never
met before. This is no exaggeration.

Recently, a new breed of ‘super care home’ has sprung up. With state of the art
facilities and activities galore, the sufficiently financially endowed can enjoy
their final years in stimulating and dignified conditions beyond the financial
reach of most normal folk.

Inhumane social policies wreak untold havoc on vulnerable families and
individuals, many of whom, don’t forget, have paid tax and national insurance
for much their lives. Why should unpaid carers be effectively punished for their
benevolence? Why should the elderly be forced to sell up for the ‘privilege’ of
living out their final days in second rate care homes? Such indictments of
current social policy speak volumes about our rulers’ priorities.

A decent society would promote compassion and provide a good standard of care to
all, not just those with money. Carers (paid and unpaid) and those receiving
care are an ever-growing body of discontents who need to organise, together with
workers, to both expose injustice and take robust action to fight for social
justice.

The 2007 Carers UK survey of 300 carers found that:

* 72% are worse off since they started caring
* 65% are not in paid work
* 54% gave up work to care
* 53% say financial worries affect their health
* 33% are in debt
* 30% are cutting back on food or heating
* 10% can’t afford to pay their rent or mortgage
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://ainfos.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en


A-Infos Information Center