A - I n f o s
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Trk�_
The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Trk�
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours ||
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF | How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
{Info on A-Infos}
(en) Britain, Aanarchist journal Direct Action #40 - national: The ‘caring’ face of New Labour
Date
Sun, 09 Nov 2008 17:41:21 +0200
Service cuts, privatisation and casualisation -- To suggest that Local Authority
social care services have taken a hammering in the last 10 years would be a
major understatement. Echoing changes that have occurred in the NHS, New Labour
policies have not only resulted in mass privatisation, but also a comprehensive
deterioration in the quality of care provided to vulnerable people living in the
community. ---- To provide some background and context: ---- Since the 1990 NHS
and Community Care Act was introduced, local authorities have been required to
purchase care services based on the principle of 'best value'. In the ensuing
period, central government grants have been incrementally shaved in real terms.
The combined effect of these factors is that private sector provider services
have been preferred simply because they are cheaper and don't operate to local
government terms and conditions, partly because of a greatly diminished union
input. Widespread redundancies have resulted as statutory provision is rendered
obsolete by market forces. Use of casual agency support staff is now also the
norm in both the private and the few remaining statutory services.
So what is the impact of this on service quality?
Many people who need help in the community have specialist support requirements,
such as learning/physical disabilities, age-related or mental health needs.
Obviously, they require a consistent, trained and focused team. Extensive use of
inexperienced and often poorly trained casual workers has meant that continuity
of care is seriously compromised. Agencies tend to have a high staff turnover,
and often service users are never sure from one week to the next who will be
supporting them.
The damaging effect on the quality of service delivery has been confirmed by a
number of high-profile investigations into the failings of social care services.
Against a backdrop of funding cuts however, it is difficult to see things improving.
Nationally, recruitment and retention of frontline support staff is now becoming
a major problem in the grossly devalued social care workforce; particularly so
in the profit-driven, poorly-paid private sector.
The wider privatisation agenda also assists the powers-that-be by weakening the
bargaining position of the remaining local authority workforce as efficiently as
any of the most draconian anti-union laws. In a climate of competitive
commissioning, those demanding decent pay and conditions are warned that they
are pricing themselves out of a job. Attempts to remove protected local
government pension rights have been well-documented previously, and further
attacks are likely as the industrial muscle of unions is progressively weakened.
The introduction of laughably-named Fair Access to Care Services legislation has
meant that some groups of vulnerable people are now being excluded from
receiving a service under new criteria. A recent survey indicated that
nationally up to 15% of people presently using homecare services will be no
longer eligible to do so. Across the country, care homes, day services and other
valuable community-based advice/support services are being systematically cut back.
Whilst the public service union UNISON continues to fund New Labour with
political levies paid by its members, it should be clear that the like of Brown,
and Blair before him, are guilty of implementing policies which have resulted in
both worsening pay and conditions for Local Authority workers, and a significant
reduction in the standard of service provided to the local community.
To add insult to injury, local government staff were recently offered a 2% wage
rise. In real terms, this amounts to a pay cut with inflation currently running
at 4.8%. The vast majority of employees have rejected this derisory offer, and
industrial action looks inevitable as we go to press. It is hoped that this will
not only provide a platform for care workers to demonstrate the extent of their
feelings at the injustices perpetrated against them, and those who they support,
but will also provide a much needed opportunity for activists to build and
spread solidarity and resistance.
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://ainfos.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center