A - I n f o s
a multi-lingual news service by, for, and about anarchists
**
News in all languages
Last 40 posts (Homepage)
Last two
weeks' posts
The last 100 posts, according
to language
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Trk�_
The.Supplement
The First Few Lines of The Last 10 posts in:
Castellano_
Deutsch_
Nederlands_
English_
Français_
Italiano_
Polski_
Português_
Russkyi_
Suomi_
Svenska_
Trk�
First few lines of all posts of last 24 hours ||
of past 30 days |
of 2002 |
of 2003 |
of 2004 |
of 2005 |
of 2006 |
of 2007 |
of 2008
Syndication Of A-Infos - including
RDF | How to Syndicate A-Infos
Subscribe to the a-infos newsgroups
{Info on A-Infos}
(en) Britain, Aanarchist journal Direct Action #40 - history - The revolution that never was
Date
Sat, 08 Nov 2008 15:04:41 +0200
In 1917 the shock waves of the Revolution went far beyond the borders of Tsarist
Russia. All over Europe war-weary and increasingly restless workers were
inspired by the news of the Tsar's overthrow, and later by the news of the
Bolsheviks' seizure of power. In Britain these events profoundly affected the
labour movement and eventually led to a significant shift from pre-war
anti-electoralism, direct action and rejection of political parties to a
movement dominated by a unified, centralised and highly-disciplined Communist
Party under Moscow's direct control.
<image>
Shop Stewards arrested in connection
with engineering strike 1917
The years before 1914 had seen widespread industrial unrest in Britain during
the period known as 'the Syndicalist Revolt'. Syndicalism had developed from the
British anti-parliamentary socialist traditions and was becoming the dominant
revolutionary current. Before the outbreak of war in 1914 the British state
faced further unrest and a potential syndicalist inspired general strike by the
militant 'Triple Alliance' of miners, railworkers and transport workers.
The war had begun with industrial calm but this ended in 1915 when the South
Wales miners and the Clyde engineers came out on strike. The latter signalled
the beginning of the Clyde Workers' Committee, the catalyst for the war-time
shop stewards movement. The syndicalist inspired shop stewards became the focus
of rank and file resistance. Trade union leaders co-operated with the government
to dampen working class discontent but the shop stewards attempted to widen the
issues and raise class antagonisms.
News of the Tsar's overthrow in February 1917 and the creation of Soviets
brought an immediate response. If Tsarist Russia, long considered the bastion of
reaction, could be overthrown then anything was possible. The mounting war
casualties, food shortages, rising prices and low wages, combined with
excitement over Russia, saw a wave of strikes in May 1917. Later in the year, in
August, there was a shop stewards' conference in Manchester declaring that the
most important features of the revolution were the 'mass uprisings and the
formation of Soviets'.
Then came the news of the second revolution in October. Reports were confused,
but in Britain the Bolsheviks were closely identified with the Soviets and were
considered to be almost syndicalist in nature. From this point onward, any
attempts to set up breakaway industrial unions were sidetracked down the blind
alley of creating a British Communist Party.
The future Communist Party of Great Britain (CPGB) was shaped by the Third
International, which was created and dominated by the Bolsheviks. The Third
International first met in March 1919. 'Delegates' were mainly Russian
Bolsheviks and a few foreign communists who happened to be in Russia at the
time. Foreign parties were 'affiliated' by so-called delegates who had little
contact with them. The meeting did little more than announce the founding of the
Third International or Comintern, and call for the immediate seizure of power by
the working class creating the dictatorship of the proletariat. Nothing was said
about the Bolsheviks' belief in the need for political centralism under their
control. Lenin calculated (not unwisely) that this would lead to any
syndicalists withdrawing their support for the new International.
At the second congress in 1920, among the British representatives were the BSP
(British Socialist Party), SLP (Socialist Labour Party), Sylvia Pankhurst's
Workers Socialist Federation (WSF) and delegates from the Shop Stewards and
Works Committee Movement (SSWCM). The main aim for Lenin and the Bolsheviks was
to set up a centralised international party with national sections modelled on
the Communist Party of Soviet Russia, i.e. the Bolsheviks themselves.
Before the Comintern conference opened, the newly arrived syndicalist delegates
from different countries were invited to attend a Comintern Executive Committee.
Here, the Bolsheviks announced they were to launch a new international trade
union organisation, the Red International of Labour Unions, ostensibly to
counter the reformist International Federation of Trade Unions, recently
launched in Amsterdam. The syndicalists were handed a document entitled 'To
Syndicalists of all Nations'. It contained a clear message; the world
syndicalist movement was to become subordinate to the communist political
leadership in Moscow. It argued for a 'close indestructible alliance between the
communist party and the trade unions' and claimed that the aim of the new
International should be to set up 'communist cells' within reformist unions in
order to capture the leadership. The syndicalists rejected the document out of hand.
The conference itself provided further controversy. On the opening day, the
Bolsheviks presented a document stating that the proletariat cannot accomplish
its revolution without a political party leading it. They argued that the aim of
the revolution was the capture of state power under the leadership of the
communist party. Thus, the Bolshevik proposals explicitly repudiated the basic
principles of revolutionary syndicalism. They claimed that the syndicalists'
rejection of political parties 'helps only to support the bourgeoisie and
counter revolutionaries...They fail to grasp that, without an independent
political party, the working class is a body without a head [and, in comparison
to revolutionary Marxism]... syndicalism and industrialism are a step backward'.
http://www.direct-action.org.uk/img/40/40-19-01.png
Commissions headed by Bolshevik experts examined each country's situation - the
'British Question' was Before the Comintern conference opened, the newly arrived
syndicalist delegates from different countries were invited to attend a
Comintern Executive Committee. Here, the Bolsheviks ann
_________________________________________
A - I N F O S N E W S S E R V I C E
By, For, and About Anarchists
Send news reports to A-infos-en mailing list
A-infos-en@ainfos.ca
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://ainfos.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/a-infos-en
Archive: http://ainfos.ca/en
A-Infos Information Center